CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Alan Armstrong
Former Executive Chairman of the Board, Williams Companies Inc

Happy Trails Episode 8 -- A Conversation with Sen. Alan Armstrong about Permitting Reform

📅 Jul 06, 2026 Senator Cynthia Lummis 17 MIN 71 VIEWS 43 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS

What Alan Armstrong said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Alan Armstrong, former Williams Companies executive and newly appointed US Senator from Oklahoma, discussed his unexpected path to the Senate and his focus on permitting reform. He argued that litigation, not federal agencies, is the primary bottleneck, citing the Sierra Club and Delaware Riverkeeper as frequent litigants. He highlighted the 401 water quality certificate as a political veto, referencing the Millennium coal facility denial in Washington. Armstrong announced a bill to be introduced next week that would integrate the 401 process into the FERC-led environmental review, preventing states from having a separate after-the-fact veto. He contrasted Pennsylvania's prosperity from natural gas royalties with New York's poverty due to anti-fossil fuel policies, and recounted a year-long delay on the Overland Pass pipeline over the three-toed jumping mouse. He emphasized the need for balance in environmental decisions.

Key takeaways

  1. Armstrong will introduce a bill next week to bring the 401 water quality certificate under the FERC process, preventing states from having a separate veto.
  2. Litigation from groups like the Sierra Club and Delaware Riverkeeper is the main cause of permitting delays, not federal agencies.
  3. The Overland Pass pipeline was delayed a year over studying the three-toed jumping mouse, which was never found.
  4. New York's ban on fracking and pipeline crossings has deprived landowners of royalties and kept natural gas prices high in New England.
  5. Armstrong was appointed to the Senate by Oklahoma's governor after the previous senator became DHS secretary.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
1986 Year Armstrong started as a field engineer for Williams timeline 3:45
120 miles Distance between low-cost gas in Marcellus and high-priced New England markets metric 5:21

Chapters

  1. 0:00Path to the Senate
  2. 3:45Permitting challenges from Williams experience
  3. 5:21New York and New England gas access
  4. 8:02Overland Pass pipeline and mouse study
  5. 9:36Litigation as the bottleneck
  6. 10:07401 water quality certificate as political veto
  7. 12:12Proposed bill to integrate 401 into FERC process

Questions asked in this interview

6
  1. 0:07Can you tell us how you got here?
  2. 2:45You were both president and CEO and then sort of head of the board of directors. Am I right?
  3. 9:26Is it time delays at the federal agency level?
  4. 10:36Which is a state veto, right?
  5. 12:10So what can we do about it as US senators?
  6. 14:16So, that — where does when does the state weigh in and say we're okay with this?
Cynthia Lummis 0:07 ↗
Well, welcome to this podcast for the Western Caucus in the US Senate. I'm Cynthia Lummis. I chair the Senate Western Caucus and I've really been looking forward to today's podcast because we are with Alan Armstrong, the new US Senator in the US Senate who is from the state of Oklahoma. And he comes to us in a very unusual way. So, welcome Senator Armstrong. It's wonderful to have you on our podcast. Can you tell us how you got here?
Alan Armstrong 0:38 ↗
Yeah. Well, thank you. I was really excited to get to talk to Cynthia. You've been such a kind and considerate face since I showed up at Senate. Coming out of business, never having any political ambitions, never having any interest in being in the Senate. And then, you know, the governor of Oklahoma asked me to, and he has the right in Oklahoma on an interim basis to make an appointment. And so, Mark Wayne Mullins, who was in this seat, which was previously Senator Inhofe's seat. So he came into the seat and then he got called up to be the DHS secretary and then it was one of those things where it was kind of merry-go-round. Next thing I knew, I got a call from the governor saying, 'Hey, could you be in my office Monday morning?' And he said, 'Well, would you consider doing the Senate role?' And I was like, 'What?' I said, 'I'm sure I can find somebody a lot better qualified. I'll help you. I know I can help you find somebody who'd be really qualified to do this, but I'm honored you'd even ask, obviously.' But so that was a conversation like two or three weeks. I didn't hear much back. I gave him some names that I thought would be good. And when I told him that, he said, 'That's not what I asked you. I asked you if you'd be willing to do it if I asked you to.' Anyway, he then called me up on a Saturday. I think that was like maybe the 19th or 20th of March and said, 'Hey, can you be in Florida to meet with President Trump tomorrow at 1:00?' And so I said, 'Well, yeah, for what?' And so he, well, I want to introduce you to him about taking this role. So that was a Sunday and then it got announced on a Monday night and I got sworn in here then on Tuesday.
Cynthia Lummis 2:45 ↗
Yeah. Isn't it a whirlwind? I am so glad your governor was persistent with you and I'm so glad that you said yes because you bring such a unique background to the Senate and it's one that we need right now because your area of interest and expertise is permitting reform and that's something that now we're even seeing on a bipartisan basis is something that's sorely needed. So, tell us how because of your longstanding role with the Williams company, which is a huge highly respected Oklahoma based company that Wyoming people are very, very familiar with. But so are others in the West and all over the country. You were both president and CEO and then sort of head of the board of directors. Am I right?
Alan Armstrong 3:34 ↗
Right. Right.
Cynthia Lummis 3:35 ↗
Okay, tell us how based on that experience you came to view permitting as something you want to address.
Alan Armstrong 3:45 ↗
Yeah, you know, I actually started off as a field engineer for Williams back in 1986 and back then we could get stuff built. You know, it wasn't all that complicated. There were requirements, environmental requirements, but it really, you know, you could go and get stuff built. In fact, I spent a lot of my time in Wyoming, building out there in upstream of Reiner, Wyoming by Rollins, and building out some of the gathering and processing systems there in that area. And, you know, it just wasn't that hard to get stuff built. Over time, as I watched it, it just got crazier and crazier and harder and harder to build to the point where we want to fuss about high prices. We want to fuss about high gasoline prices in California. People want to fuss about high utility prices in New England. And yet, we have some of the lowest cost resources sitting there available, but we won't build the infrastructure. California, you know, kind of shut out everything, all fossil fuel. New England, particularly the governor of New York, shut down pipelines going across the state of New York to bring the lowest cost gas, not just in the nation, but in some areas the lowest cost gas in the world in Marcellus and Utica. And you're trying to get it into the New England states.
Cynthia Lummis 5:14 ↗
Which is some of the highest in the wintertime, some of the highest price. It's only 120 miles in Wyoming speak. That's nothing.
Alan Armstrong 5:21 ↗
Nothing. Yeah. And so 120 miles away, we've got some of the lowest cost gas, some of the highest price gas. People are livid about their utility bills. And it's all because we've got a permitting process that allows people to stop critical infrastructure like that. So, the home heating oil that they use in New England and is extremely high priced is something that you through the Williams company wanted to get to that market and save them all that money with clean burning natural gas, which is the cleanest burning hydrocarbon by far.
Cynthia Lummis 6:01 ↗
Right?
Alan Armstrong 6:01 ↗
And lower their costs and they said no. Right. And particularly the governor of New York said can't cross my state with your pipeline even though this was going through very rural areas that actually wanted the pipeline to come through the rural areas because they wanted access; in most those areas they're either burning fuel oil or propane and they wanted access, particularly the industries and the businesses wanted access to the low-cost natural gas. But in New York what you figure out pretty quickly is it doesn't really make any difference if you're upstate New York. The only voters that really dictate anything are downstate and Manhattan.
Cynthia Lummis 6:43 ↗
And so the poor folks in New York, not only do they not have access to that low-cost natural gas, there's tremendous gas reserves in the Marcellus that sit in New York and they've banned fracking in New York.
Alan Armstrong 6:59 ↗
They have. And so they've stopped themselves from being able to take — I love taking people up there and showing them when you drive around in that area. In Pennsylvania, you drive by and you see these beautiful farms and ranches with brand new fences, big brand new four-wheel John Deeres everywhere you look. Beautiful. I mean, just really, you know, Wow, these people are like this looks like Kentucky ranches around here. Exactly. And then you go right across the border and it is desolate and impoverished. It is because the people in Pennsylvania have had the benefit of getting the royalties off all of that gas in that area, and the governors and the politics in New York have been anti-fossil fuel and they've stopped — not just they're stopping access for other people to access the gas, but the landowners in that area are stopped from being able to get the royalties off the gas in that market.
Cynthia Lummis 7:56 ↗
Yeah. So, you saw this firsthand. You were boots on the ground trying to help people in America. Yeah.
Alan Armstrong 8:02 ↗
And couldn't get her done, right? And so it's just, you know, it's crazy some of the stuff. But I remember, I always kind of when I think about Wyoming, I think about when I first started working there and the last project that I was involved with there, which was the Overland Pass pipeline, which was a natural gas liquids pipeline that comes out of Kemmerer, actually starts all the way down in the Piceance and then comes up to Kemmerer and then across along I-80 and then south into Kansas. And that pipeline was held up for a year over studying to make sure we knew exactly where the three-toed jumping mouse
Cynthia Lummis 8:48 ↗
Meadow jumping mouse.
Alan Armstrong 8:49 ↗
Oh, I know it well. I mean, I've never seen one because it's a subspecies. I don't — we never found one. We never found one, but we looked and looked and looked and looked for one.
Cynthia Lummis 8:59 ↗
I hear you.
Alan Armstrong 9:00 ↗
And so I'm — listen, I love the outdoors. I love wildlife. I love the fact that we work hard to protect our environment, but we can't exist as a nation and be competitive with other nations when we don't have balance to those decisions and we don't find ways to allow ourselves to mitigate that. Like, it wasn't like we were going to — nobody said, 'Hey, we found them.' It was just, 'Well, we need to study it further to make sure they're not here.'
Cynthia Lummis 9:26 ↗
So, is where's the biggest bottleneck? Is it litigation? Is it time delays at the federal agency level? What's your —
Alan Armstrong 9:36 ↗
Everybody always thinks that it's the big bad federal agencies. And I will say that they are bureaucratic. I'm not going to say that they're speedy, but they're generally well-intended, effective agencies. The problem is that the litigation has forced all of these agencies to go, 'Oh my god, we're going to get sued. We better make sure we know exactly what's here.'
Cynthia Lummis 10:03 ↗
So, it's all the litigation that's on their heads.

22 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Armstrong, A. (2026, July 6). Happy Trails Episode 8 -- A Conversation with Sen. Alan Armstrong about Permitting Reform [Interview transcript]. Senator Cynthia Lummis. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1069391/

MLA

Alan Armstrong. "Happy Trails Episode 8 -- A Conversation with Sen. Alan Armstrong about Permitting Reform." Senator Cynthia Lummis, 6 Jul. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1069391/.

BibTeX
@misc{armstrong2026_1069391,
  author       = {Alan Armstrong},
  title        = {Happy Trails Episode 8 -- A Conversation with Sen. Alan Armstrong about Permitting Reform},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Senator Cynthia Lummis. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {jul},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1069391/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}