CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Ian Rogers
Chief Human Agency Officer (formerly Chief Experience Officer), Ledger

From Slayer T-Shirts to Louis Vuitton: Ian Rogers on Selling Culture

📅 Aug 10, 2026 Dialectic Podcast with Jackson Dahl 157 MIN 22 VIEWS 91 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
Full transcript and all links: https://dialectic.fm/ian-rogers Ian Rogers is Chief Human Agency Officer of Ledger, the Paris-based security company whose hardware wallets secure much of the world's crypto. He now focuses on how Ledger can enable us to work with AI agents while maintaining our secrets and value. His career has spanned music, culture, brand, and "the technolog(ies) people are going to hate next." He built and ran the Beastie Boys web presence in the 90s before working on music on the internet for over a decade: file sharing at Nullsoft (Winamp and Gnutella), early streaming at...

What Ian Rogers said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Ian Rogers discussed his career philosophy, emphasizing participation over spectatorship, rooted in his punk rock background. He argued that culture is sold before product, citing LVMH and Louis Vuitton as examples where brands appeal to a niche, not everyone. He rejected claims of cultural stagnation, asserting that 99.9% of content is garbage but the remaining 1% is worth finding, citing artists like Clipse and Twisted Teens. Rogers also detailed his role at Ledger, shifting from Chief Experience Officer to Chief Human Agency Officer, focusing on securing AI agents. He stressed that agents should only suggest actions, with humans or policies approving every move, and highlighted Ledger's hardware as essential for this security. He recounted personal stories, including Jimmy Iovine's mentorship and Bernard Arnault's hiring of John Galliano, to illustrate his beliefs about talent and brand building.

Key takeaways

  1. Rogers argues that culture is a prerequisite to selling product, citing Louis Vuitton and Slayer T-shirts as serving the same function in society.
  2. He claims 99.9% of all music, movies, books, and NFTs are garbage, but the job is to find the 1% that's awesome.
  3. Rogers says Ledger's new role as Chief Human Agency Officer is to ensure AI agents can only suggest actions, with humans or policies approving every move.
  4. Rogers asserts that building a brand takes a generation, citing Golden Goose's slow growth to $500 million after 15 years.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
85% Percentage of population that are not Bernard Arnault's customers metric 1:01:28
30% Apple's app store commission metric 55:38
$60 billion Valuation of Cursor's company metric 1:25:19
50% Share of Ledger's business from services metric 1:25:19
$500 million Golden Goose's revenue after 15 years metric 1:01:28
$2 trillion US stimulus during COVID metric 1:25:19

Chapters

  1. 0:00Punk rock and participation
  2. 17:03What makes a scene
  3. 26:27Defending modern culture
  4. 30:45Music taste and Kanye
  5. 53:56Selling culture not product
  6. 1:01:28Building brands takes generations
  7. 1:43:23Ledger's role in AI security
  8. 2:24:47Advice on work, parenting, love

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 20:12They created it, but it also included X Large Mike D, used to have a record store on Vermont. You know what I mean?
  2. 30:45It's really, at this point, like, what is wrong with you? What's the point?
  3. 53:34Um, and I don't even know if we totally followed the advice as much as we should have, but you said, never forget you're selling culture, not product. What does that actually mean?
  4. 58:47How can brands accumulate value or maybe accumulate meaning in a way that people can't?
  5. 1:16:50And what do you think has made you good at it?
  6. 1:25:19So last summer, you know, when, when I started using, you know, Claude code, if you'd have asked me like, is this the next big thing?
  7. 1:55:11And now what are people building?
  8. 2:06:01What's real here, what do you think makes you good at seeing what's real here?
  9. 2:08:16What keeps you working so hard?
  10. 2:16:46What is the top five desert island album list?
  11. 2:22:55Any advice for working or maybe any thoughts on working with your friends?
  12. 2:27:32Any advice on relationships or thoughts on love?
Ian Rogers 0:00 ↗
I've always just tried to find, like, what's the technology people are going to hate next? From like, file sharing to streaming to crypto to now AI. What's the technology people are going to be really angry about tomorrow? How do I get into that one? I remember Jimmy calling me. I was locked out of my own house and sitting on my back steps. Jimmy. Ian, what are you doing? Ian, you're a major league player. Why are you playing in the minors? Jimmy saw something in me that I didn't see. One of the things that Jimmy Iovine and Ben, I don't know, share is they see something in people. Ben, I don't know, is the wealthiest man in Europe and probably 80, 85% of the population are not his customers. That's okay. The goal is not to appeal to everyone. Anyone who is in the business of individuality has had an amazing 20 years. You know, a Louis Vuitton handbag and a Slayer T shirt serve exactly the same function in society. Anytime anyone tells you something sucks, you can just say, shut up and do your job. It's so easy to find things that suck. 99.9% of all music, all movies, all books, all human beings, all NFTs. Yes. Are garbage. Find me the 1%. That's awesome spiritually. The thing about punk rock is you're all peers and you are judged on your contribution. You are not a spectator. You are a participant who is meant to engage. That was the unlock for me. And I feel like everything I've been a part of after has been that in some way, all the way up to today with what's going on with AI. Right. I feel like a participant, not a consumer. The great Ted Nugent, he said, I've got news for you. I don't watch anything. I do shit.
Host 1:37 ↗
Welcome to Dialectic Episode 54 with Ian Rogers. I met Ian in early 2020. I was in Paris just before things got weird. We were building an esports team called 100 Thieves. Ian was the Chief Digital Officer of LVMH at the time. There was something he said that stuck with me, which was to not forget that ultimately you are selling culture before you are selling product. I think that was relevant for what we were doing, but I also think it's broadly representative of Ian in his career. He has had a career that's probably too long to list here, but to give you a sense of his path, he started as a skateboarder and kid who was into punk rock in Goshen, Indiana. He created a fan site that became the Beastie Boys website and he became their webmaster. He worked with Justin Frankel and co on Winamp and Gnutella. He then went to Yahoo Music where he created the first streaming all you can eat music subscription, was at Top Spin for several years as the CEO and then joined Jimmy Iovine as the CEO of Beats Music before and through their acquisition to Apple, which became of course Apple Music. In some sense. Ian spent the first 15 years or so of his career trying to get music on the Internet and certainly succeeded alongside the folks at Spotify.
Shortly after joining Apple, Ian zagged and was recruited by Bernard Arnault and LVMH to become their Chief Digital Officer, helping the various maisons modernize when it came to E commerce and the Internet. He then zagged again and joined Ledger as the Chief Experience Officer. Ledger, if you're not familiar, is a crypto hardware wallet company where Ian still works today, although he changed his role recently to the Chief Human Agency Officer where he is focused on thinking through how we will manage and work with wildly powerful agents, especially when they have access to secrets, information and value. Ian has spent his career at the frontier of technology and what's cool and I spoke to him about this and much more. We talked a lot about music as that is his first and true love and this was an honor. If you enjoy the episode, please share it with a friend. As Ian says, the best way for creative works to spread is through word of mouth. Thank you so much for listening.
Before we get into the episode, I'd like to thank Notion Dialectic's presenting partner. Notion is a collaborative workspace for your life's work. Many of you are probably well familiar with it as an amazing note taking tool, collaborative database tool, and much more, and they have spent the last year and a half or so integrating AI and agents in a way that feels native and obvious. The reason Notion, I think is so valuable when it comes to working with AI is that context matters not only when you're using it alone, but when you're especially when you're using it with your team and collaborators. Being able to have a single place where all of your context and data is where you're actually doing the work, and where you can work with increasingly powerful agents and models, whether that be open source or the most powerful frontier models in the world, the day they come out is truly powerful. It's also been amazing to watch the Notion team evolve over the time that we've been working together and get to work with some really special people. Notion's co Founder Akshay Kothari recently told me that There are nearly 50 ex founders now working at Notion, which I think Speak speaks to not only the quality, but the level of scrappiness and resourcefulness and agency amongst the various people who work there, many of whom I get to collaborate with. If you are interested in working with the team there, whether it be on product and marketing, engineering, storytelling or otherwise, please reach out to them directly or to [email protected] you can learn more at notion.com dialectic and by supporting Notion, you support Dialectic and me and the show with that. Here is my conversation with Ian Rogers and.
Ian Rogers 5:23 ↗
And so I was like, well, you know, A, if I have tattoos on my fingers, B, I'll never be able to hide from myself. Yeah, right. Can't like grow up and be normal and then. But better than the eye drop or something? Yeah, exactly. I've always said I'd only get a face tattoo if. If Antoine Dixon and Lil Wayne were in the room. If the two of them were both in the room, I'm down. But that hasn't happened. What is, what are the. I assume they're Chinese characters or Japanese. It says to become a dragon. I always say it means I'm a jackass. I tattooed my fingers. Are most of the rest of the tattoos that also that old? No, like the back, I'm just trying to finish now. Oh, cool. I won't get to it until I don't do it in the summer because you got to keep it out of the sun. Yeah. So I'll finish the back. Also, though, I have to say I'm feeling my age. Like when I did the back like last, last fall, I was like, oh, man, I might be done, but I gotta finish it. I think you gotta keep going. I gotta finish it. Have they been pretty? It'd be fun to see the like, line chart of age to tattoo volume. Yeah, there would. There would be. There would be a, A drop off during my second marriage and a pickup during. After divorce that would be otherwise constant. Nah, not really. Not really. To be honest, I wonder if tattoos are trending up or down. Well, I, I would say trending up and I would say that there's a specific reason for that. I think that anyone who is in the business of individuality, helping you distinguish yourself as an individual, has had an amazing 20 years. Right. And that doesn't matter if it is, you know, beauty. And I thought about this when I was at LVMH because, you know, we had Sephora and Lots of beauty brands. And you know, you just realize that like Instagram was crazy and they really expanded the total addressable market because it's not like, it's not like you had like children as, you know, beauty influencers, you know, before Instagram. Right. Or TikTok. So anyone who's in the business of, you know, so again, that could be beauty, that could be tattoos. Anyone who's in the business of helping you say, I'm a member of that tribe and not that tribe. And that's what I realized too, is that, you know, a Louis Vuitton handbag and a Slayer T shirt serve exactly the same function in society. Is there a start to this podcast? Yeah, I think, I think we're in it. I was going to say when it starts, I'm going to open this. All right, let's rock. Let's get some fresh can opens.
So first of all, my disclaimer is off a flight from Tokyo yesterday morning. I've been up since 5am I've been, I guess working since. Got a nice 10k in. Yeah, working since 5am we ran it, we ran a 10k. I made it through. Thank you for joining me. I finished my last meeting at 7pm and that's why we have these delicious Mexican lagers from the beer store road. Yeah, beautiful. That last conversation we were having started with me asking about your tattoos. My first question is, what does punk rock mean to you in a spiritual sense? I'll tell you exactly what it means to me. And I apologize because I've told this story before, but I mean, I grew up just loving rock and roll. I, you know, my, I have a brother and sister, eight, nine years older than me. And you know, my, my brother outgrew his Kiss records and handed them down to me. And that was like also my first experience with art, right? Like think about the COVID of Kiss, Destroyer, the COVID of Kiss, Rock and Roll Over. They're like really amazing pieces of art. Especially like you're a sick five, six year old kid. You're like, what is happening in this universe, right? So, and then, you know, my, my journey through music was kind of rock and roll, right? ACDC in like first and second grade and then junior high. I like Rush and Led Zeppelin and read like, you know, I remember like the book I read when I was in seventh grade was, you know, the ha, the Gods, the Led Zeppelin Saga, which by the way, a child should not read. But then, you know, I, I, I saw those bands. My mom took me to see Kiss when I was 13 years old and she took me to CACDC. It was WASP opening for KISS. It was Fast Way. Yep, a fast way opening for acdc. I saw Rush at Cobo hall in Detroit, you know, but. And I'm like 13 years old and these are my first experiences, you know, with, with like seeing the music that I love and in person. But also like I'm sitting, you know, we don't have much money, so we're sitting in the bleachers, you know, the like my favorite band is like a postage stamp like somewhere down at the bottom. But then I started skateboarding and getting into punk rock. Like you just, you just find your way to that music. You open Thrasher magazine, you see Agent Orange and TSOL and like, how do I get those? And then this kid moves from, from Florida and not only does he drive a bike. Black Firebird with the gold, the gold eagle on the COVID on the front, on the hood of the car. But he has amazing punk rock cassettes. Minor Threat, Agnostic Front, mdc. Somehow we get into Straight Edge, which is, you know, I like drinking a beer and talking about Straight Edge. But like, you know, don't drink, don't smoke, don't fuck. At least I can think as, as Ian Makai famously that was introduced to you specifically by this guy. Like most or even all these things. Like this is like, this is real like rabbit hole stuff. Okay. You know what I mean? Like it's no different than what I do today. Like I realize now that like you're either that person or you're not. And I always was, but I didn't know that other people weren't right. So anything worth doing is worth overdoing. So if I'm into punk rock, then I need, I want to know all of it. Like I go, I drive an hour to Track records near Notre Dame and buy a copy of Maximum Rock and Roll. And then you read every review and you ask your, you take your allowance and ask your mom to write checks and mail order albums from. I was going to say the rabbit holes are a lot harder. Yeah, yeah, the rabbit holes were hard. Like you would read a three line review in the back of Maximum Rock and Roll. And then I'd have to ask my mom to write a check cuz I don't have a checkbook. I have allowance and I had a job even. But you know, because you work, you're. When you're a kid in Indiana, where the work ethic comes from. But so I had money, not much, but enough to buy 7 inch vinyl and you know, so you ended up like in this rabbit hole. One of the rabbit holes was, was Straight Edge. It's actually Straight Edge is like worth talking about, right? It's. It was a movement. It was an anti drug movement by teenagers in the 80s. Crazy, you know, and it's incredible. And I, and I super identified with it. So I'll find my way around the answer 15 and I jumping around a little bit, but it does fill in pieces of the puzzle. Ian Mackay from Minor Threat, Fugazi, Embrace, Discord Records. I saw him in a movie that was on television. Night Flight showed a movie called Another State of Mind that was really about the band Social distortion. But Ian MacKaye like appears in it in the middle and he has this line where he says, yeah, I didn't know what I wanted to be, but I knew I didn't want to be like the football players at my school. And for me at 15, I was like, that guy is talking to like I, I identify with that so deeply. And so, yeah, I mean, don't drink, you know, don't smoke, don't. At least I can think. Was like, okay, I'm with you on this, man. And I was primed for it. Yeah. Okay. So to come back to punk rock and what does it mean spiritually? We were 15 years old. I think the band, the Straight Edge Band, Youth of Today is playing in Chicago. It's a four hour drive. We convinced Ryan Timmons dad to drive us there and it's an all ages show. You go to the show and there's four bands. Bastro Soul side, Youth of Today and the Henry Rollins Band. And we were like, isn't that the guy from Black Flag? Like we didn't really know much about Henry Rollins in 1986 or 87, whenever that was. But while we're watching the other bands in this teeny club, Henry Rollins is just standing to my left. The guys in the band I love are standing to my right. This is the difference between being a spectator and being a participant. Yes. And that's what it means to me. There's a great, you know, the great Ted Nugent, who is a colorful character from Detroit who played in a rock and roll band called the Amboy Dukes and also his eponymous Ted Nugent Ness. He said in a Grand Royal interview in the 90s, they were asking about MT and he said, I've got news for you, I don't watch anything. I do. And like that also resonated with me. So to me that spiritually, the thing about punk rock is you're all peers and you are judged on your contribution. Not. You are not a. A spectator who is meant to, you know, buy a ticket and buy merch. You're a participant who is meant to engage. And I think that's what. That, to me, is what punk rock means. That was the unlock for me. And I feel like everything I've been a part of after has been that in. In some way all the way up to today with what's going on with AI. Right. I. I feel like a. A participant, not a consumer.
Host 15:05 ↗
It's funny, it's. I think that's just a message that could be quite resonant with many young people today. It also, like. I mean, the first thing it reminds me of, despite him, at least on the surface, not being a very punk rock person, maybe he is spiritually. There's that old Steve Jobs video where he's like, when you realize that the world was created by no one smarter than you and that you can, like, poke the universe and, like, get some feedback. Yeah. Like, it's the meme of the. You're sitting back of the chair and you lean forward playing the video game. Like, what? Call it Agency? Call whatever you want. What a. What an amazing thing to, like, internalize. Totally. And probably not something that really leaves you once you get it, regardless of how you get it.
Ian Rogers 15:46 ↗
Yeah, I think that's true. You know, one time working with Jimmy Ivey, and I asked him, like, why do you do this? I think it was right around the time of his 60th birthday. And I was curious. I'm like, why do you get out of bed in the morning, man? Like. Cause he was the hardest working person in my life. He was my first phone call at 7 o'clock in the morning. He was my last phone call at 11 o' clock in the morning. You ask my daughter, you know, she'll say, oh, yeah, we were at Jimmy's house every weekend, right? Because there's always a reason that we were meeting somebody for lunch on Saturday and we go to Jimmy's, like, nobody works harder than Jimmy. And I was like, what's your motivation? Why do you do this? And he said, once you've moved culture, it's a high, you always want to get back. He said to me, he said, there was a before Eminem and an after Eminem. And that's a feeling. And once you've done it, you just want to do it again. You'll move any mountain. Yeah. And so I think it's that Steve Jobs thing. And I think that Steve Jobs and Jimmy really shared.
Host 16:47 ↗
So there's a cultured mag profile on you from a little while ago. And in it it says, despite hopscotching across fashion and music and crypto, Roger's skill set remains singular. He gets to know a cultural scene, then he brings more people into it, maybe to start what makes a scene.
Ian Rogers 17:03 ↗
Yeah, that's a great question. And how has what makes a scene changed? I think it is a function of media in some way. Right. There's a McLuhan the medium is the message thing in here somewhere where if you think about how hard it was to create a scene with the technology of fill in the blank and how that's changed. Right. You know, what's an interesting example is skateboarding. Think about, like, the business model of skateboarding in the 90s. It was there. Nobody made money in competitions really. Right. So the. What you had to do was sell boards. How do you sell boards while you get popular with kids? How do you get popular with kids while you get seen in a VHS cassette that gets passed around, you know, and. And so, yeah, that. That's when you think about it, like, wow, you. Friction at every step of that process. Exactly. Yet you could actually kind of build a career that way. And people did. Yes. You know, and then also that of course, determines, like, what kind of skateboarder is popular, you know, because, like, you've gotta. You've gotta be popular. No one's gonna buy your boards. Right. So when maybe to go back to McLuhan, you even have to be the type of skateboarder who can pop on a vhs. Exactly. You've gotta, you know, and by the way, like, the amount of work that they would put into those parts. Yeah, right. Because that's literally. How am I going to eat for the next 24 months? Is going to be based on, you know, if I can do some in this video that no one's done before. Right. And a really interesting way to move things forward. Right. Think about, like, the difference between that and, you know, NFL. Right. It's a very. It's like a very different business model. Very disabling. I. I think that, like, my. My point really was that, like, technology is. Is in here somewhere because, you know, you know, I think your interview with Yancey actually covers this pretty well, because you ask him, like, what is a label? Right? And a label is just sort of a group of people gathered around an idea, and then that can create a scene like that. That could. So the, you know, it could Be a particular, you know, an artist or, you know, for example, you know, Andy Warhol in the Factory with Velvet Underground, you know, et cetera. It also could be an artist in the sense of the Beastie Boys, you know, created really a diaspora that I'm proud to be a part of. But it's. It. We really, it really was like kind of a global, like minded group. I was just in Tokyo and I spent a lot of my time with Rip Zinger, who I know through the Beastie Boys and is sort of like part of that, just being with him. It's obvious that we're both part of that scene even though we're in our fucking 50s. Right. You know what I mean? So I, I think, but, but I don't know. And I, I guess I'm not sure what that means today. I think it, I think it might mean a lot less today because I think that we were, we were much more tied to the scene either like in or out of it. I don't feel that from kids today, but maybe I'm just, maybe I'm just old.
Host 20:12 ↗
I've had this conversation with a few different people, maybe with the ncaa. I can't quite remember. The, the meta point that I think a lot of people have made is because everything's so much less frictionful, it's harder for the boundaries that sort of create a scene to hold. Makes sense. So any, like, yeah, maybe you could have a Discord server or a thing here or there, but like everything on the Internet is much more legible. And one of the theories that I have and I think others have spoken about is like, that friction is part of what, like creates the, the, the connection that says we're, we're part of this group, we're not part of that group. Yeah. When everyone can move super freely, it's, it's harder. I wonder if it's also, you know, if you think about kind of moving from living in public on Instagram and like sending up your beacon to being in group chats. Right. You know, like, is the group chat a scene or is it not a scene? Because it doesn't need to advertise itself. You know, it's closed by default. Right. To be a scene. Yeah. Does it need to advertise itself? Does it need to, does it need to recruit? My initial response would be it depends on what stage. Like, my sense is that there are a lot of group chats that have started as these sort of private containers and have gained a lot of power over time. Yeah. This is kind of the classic Yancey thing is this sort of, like, I forget who first come it was Venkatesh Rao, somebody like this. They're talking about, like, you have this kind of cozy web, or you have this group of people, and then when they go participate in the public arena as the gladiator or whatever, it's almost like there's this conspiracy of, like, people. And you don't like people responding to the tweet who you don't know they're actually already in cahoots with. Yeah, but it's a different thing for sure. You know, the responding to a tweet is such a. A great thing to say because you realize, like, we just don't know at this point, like, if they're like, that has very little purchase at this point, because that. That response is probably a bot, most likely, you know? Yeah. And so now. Now that, like, it's the. Those waters are so muddy. I was thinking about, like, what is a scene in this term? Because, like, Harper Reed has an amazing AI builder group, and I love it. It's, like, really an honor to be a part of it. Also, you know, there. There are some of these, like, kind of Silicon Valley, you know, groups that I'm in where you're. You know, for me, I feel like I'm in there with, like, people that are building things that I use every day, you know? You know, and so is that a scene or is that a professional networking group? You know what I mean? Like, what. And what's the difference? Exactly. And I think about, like, the Beastie Boys example is actually an interesting one, because I feel like they were a part of scenes. Like they were part of the punk rock scene in New York. They were part of the hip hop scene in New York. And to me, the greatest part of the Beastie Boys book is, like, really getting a feel for what it was like to grow up in New York in the 80s when, like, culture happened there. And everything that I experienced in Indiana was downstream of those things that were happening there on the ground every day. And they were really a part of those scenes. Yeah. Meeting me in the bathroom. Same idea. Yeah, yeah. Like, those are real, real scenes. At the same time, the scene the Beastie Boys created, I almost feel like it was almost like reluctant, like they, you know, they. They kind of. They created Grand Royal, because in Check youk Head, they put a little note that said, if you'd like the lyrics, send a dollar to this address. And they ended up, by the way, that's some friction. Yeah, exactly. Well, and. But also they kind of thought, like, well, we'll see if anyone does that. I remember, like, we had trash bags full of those dollars, those envelopes in the Grand Royal offices. And, you know, it was quite a. Like, a difficult thing to respond to all of them. And I think that also to their credit, they looked at that and they went, if we just send these people lyrics, we're idiots, there's more we can do here. And they created Grand Rail magazine out of that impulse. Right. Out of going, like, wait, we have an audience here. And so now. Was that a scene? I guess so. They created it, but it also included X Large Mike D, used to have a record store on Vermont. You know what I mean? Like, you start, like, then you start putting pieces together. But, yeah, I think technology has always been a limiting factor. And maybe now. Yeah, to your point, it's. I think it's really, like. I think that's a great way to put it. I hadn't thought of it before, but, like, because of the lack of friction, then the. You. The these. The friction was kind of the guardrails that kept it. And I have to say, like, I was always a part of scenes. Like, I was like, very much, you know, if it wasn't on these labels, I wasn't going to listen to it sort of thing. And then there are these two, you know, friends I made in high school that just taught me that. That actually it's all nonsense. Like, 99 of every genre and every scene is garbage. And actually your job is to find the. The 1% of everything. That's amazing. Traverse. Yeah, exactly. And to traverse. So I think that, you know, there's also, like, you know, I think some people are just more oriented that way. Right.
Another cut on this would be There's Been People. One person as an example, I don't know if you're familiar with him, is W. David Marx, who wrote Status and Culture. And there's a new book kind of on, like, it's called Blank Space. Right. I know the name, but I haven't read it. He and many other cultural commentators have kind of made this point that, like, we're sort of like an end of history for culture. Like, there's no new culture being created. Everything's derivative. One theory for this, if it's true, which I think is probably a grand statement, is the lack of subculture or the lack of scenes like this. To what extent do you see new culture forming, particularly at the edges, like, where one theory behind this could be, like, it has to Be low status. That's harder for those things to materialize. Maybe it's good when something like crypto is less popular than whatever. But as someone who seems to have been very much on the edge of what was really interesting or cool is a challenging word, but the edge of cool for many years, long after you were 19. I'm curious if there's anything or where you would even look.
Ian Rogers 26:27 ↗
Man. I mean, I. I haven't heard his argument, but I couldn't disagree more. I. I mean, I think that sounds like a. Like a really typical old person argument to me. Like things were better when I was a kid and. But I think he's probably late 30s. Okay. Well, you know, he's old well beyond his years. I. Because, I mean, I would. Let me. Let me approach this in a couple ways because I just think it's kind of patently false. First of all, my challenge would be name one culture that's not derivative. I can't think. I mean, that's not how humans work, right? Like, everything that we do is derivative. Right. We're always building on the. On the shoulders of giants in every aspect of life without. And you know, without. Without Robert Johnson, there's no Rolling Stones and without next, there's no iPhone. Right? Like this. All of these things are true. We're always. We're all. Everything is derivative by definite. By definition. Also, I would argue that, like, there's so much subculture on, you know, look, on Instagram and YouTube, it's like the humor is so specific. Like, by the way, Doom scroll forever, please, ladies and gentlemen. How about fake music Br. On. On Instagram? Like Doom Scroll. Doom scroll forever. I don't know if the comedy is made only for me, but it's my favorite thing on the Internet, period. You know, and. And really I would say we have so much more subculture. Like, you know, you know, if you're soup. Whatever you're super into, it's on yout. Right, Right. And it's Some of it's super deep. Right. Like, you know, you think about like whatever, this thing's been around forever. Fan fiction and this. And this sort of, you know, and this fanfiction. Sorry to interrupt you. Fan fiction's may be a great point to latch onto though, because I think part of the. The point here isn't that there's infinite depth on whatever. I want to also talk about Internet niche. I think I totally agree with you there. I think the point is less like you can go infinite YouTube rabbit hole on anything you want, but that it's sort of regurgitated. Like, it's. It's like compounding in on itself versus progressing culture forward. I'm still not sure I agree. You don't agree? Like, I. In a way that feels like. Honestly, I really think it feels like somebody saying, media used to work like this when I was a kid. And it doesn't work like that anymore. Yeah, right. You know what I mean? Because media physics changes. It reminds me of even, like, you know, I remember I was at the JP Morgan conference in 2021, and I remember just this moment of watching these, like, old billionaires sit on stage and ask, like they were. They were furrowing their brow and asking, like, when do we go back to a more centrist political dialogue? And I was like, you just asked, when do we go back to three channels on television? Like, the answer is, we don't go back to three channels on television, therefore, we don't go back to a more centrist political dialogue. You'll always encounter old people saying, oh, there's no good music anymore. Right, right. I'm just. I'm not saying that's what this guy's argument is. I'm just saying it's. This is like, you will encounter this in your life. And it's a sort of a similar argument. Okay, so here's what you do. Always. In that case, say, what year would you say music was great? They're 18. So first of all, the answer is when they were in college, like, invariably don't lead them. But I'm sure that'll be the answer. Then what you do is you pull out your phone, you type in Billboard Hot 100 that year, and then you show it to them and they will go, oh, but yeah, that's not what I was listening to. And I would say, exactly. In those days, you were looking at the underground, you were looking for the good shit. And now you are judging music based on the Billboard Hot 100. Right, right, right, right. And so this is the problem with these things, like, anytime. And by the way, also, anytime anyone tells you something sucks, you can just say, shut up and do your job. It's so easy to find things that suck. 99.9% of all music, all movies, all books, all human beings, all NFTs. Yes. Are garbage, Right? Do your job. Find me the 1%. That's awesome. That's what I would. That's what I would say to him right. This year. It's Twisted Teens. Fucking greatest band I've heard in 10 years. And what are they. They're New Orleans steel guitar, punk rock. Are they a part of a scene? Are they even a part of a genre? I don't know. Yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, but it's awesome and that's all that matters.
Host 30:45 ↗
Part of this maybe, too, is that you have to be looking. I. I think I was texting you about this. I recently interviewed Tyler Cowan and my friend Nabil, and I currently have a viral Instagram reel going crazy because Tyler was saying. I think he literally said rap is basically dead and electronica is kind of born out. And he's like, waiting for AI music to get good. I think part of the implication here, too, is, like, you can't look in the spot you were looking prior. Yeah. And there is something really fresh and interesting and new, but it's probably not quite 2025 shaped, let alone 2015 shaped. It also might not be your taste. Yeah. You know what I mean? Like, I'm experiencing that with. With hip hop generally. Right. I was like a. Like a 90s hip hop nerd, right. I listened like, you know, Pitchfork tells me this is a great new rap record. I put it on, and nine times out of 10, I'm like, oh, this is not for me. And that's probably just me. Not. That's not. Well, maybe. Do you think it's possible that hip hop is significantly less artistically innovative than it was 10, 15 years ago? It makes sense, given how. Yeah, I think you could say that about every genre, Right. I mean, like, just actually start with the oldest, right? Like, go. Go put on, like, a new blues record from Alligator Records. Is it innovative, right? No, it is not innovative in the slightest. Right. There's always these moments when art forms are new, and the best thing about them is there's no rules. Like, I would argue that hip hop is dead, since you could say that's not hip hop. You know what I mean? And then everything else is exceptions to the rule, you know what I mean? Like, as soon as you could say, oh, that's not hip hop, like, well, now actually, now you've made a box and you tried to put the art in a box. And it's only the people that escape that box that are gonna be interesting. Right? And so I. But I. And I think all, you know, certainly electronic music is that, like, electronic, like, electronic music was so exciting when it was new and it was like, what is this? Like, the first time I heard, you know, Richard D. James album by Aphex Twin, I was like, this is the future of music, period. Like, I don't even know what. For what it's worth, Tyler was definitely praising Effects Trend, but it's a great example because, like, if you. If in the 90s, you were like, oh my God, this is going to be so exciting. And then ultimately you realize that electronic music wasn't even a genre, it was just an excuse to take drugs, then you were super disappointed. Right, Because Apex Twin really felt like the future of classical music, you know, like, wow. And so now you're just like, oh, no, it's just like, you know, it's just people, you know, like four on the floor. Like, like getting high in a 90 of everything is boring. Yeah, yeah, exactly. So in other words. Yeah, exactly so. And I think. But I think it's the same. The same with. The same with hip hop, right? Like, like every other genre, most of it's terrible. It's not like a genre is good. It's not like hip hop good, country bad. No, most hip hop is terrible. Most country is terrible. And guess what? There's amazing in both too, if you're willing, you know, to do the filtering and, and look. And also, like, I love the exceptions that prove the rule, you know, the one for the past year is Clips. Yeah. Best record. You know, I mean, I don't. Best record. One of my favorite records of. Of the past couple of years is the Clips record. I mean, Push is so talented as. As like just a rapper. He has everything that I want. You know, he's, he's, he's, he's clever, he's wordplay, he's swag, he's smart. He's also dumb. You know, he's not dumb. He's. He's super smart, but he knows when to play dumb and to. And to like have it drug talk or, you know, and you know, it's. To me, it's like everything that I want, like having Malice back. Like, everybody, I could tell you, like, we saw clips in LA and like when Malice walks out on stage, it's like I feel like everyone in the room wanted to start crying, you know, because. And to me, like, Clips doesn't even sound contemporary. It sounds like the hip hop I grew up, you know what I mean? That feeling like something you used to love also new versus just feeling. Feeling nostalgic. Yeah. I think. And I think, by the way, I'm comfortable at age 53 saying I don't know. And I don't feel like I need to know. You know what I mean? Like, it's all about tier one to you. And having kids teaches you that as well. It's like, I don't care what they listen to. I just love that they love music, you know? And so we all realize that, you know, like, there is not a. There is. There are no absolutes there. You know, there isn't a. There isn't a good. I mean, I'm a music snob, but I also know there is no such thing as good or bad. Why did you. I think Old Dirty Bastard is the most talented vocalist of the 20th century, and I probably will be hard pressed to find anyone who agrees with me, but that's okay. Why do. We're dangerously close to the taste discourse, but why do across artistic mediums. It's almost a recursive question. But the people with good taste seem to converge on similar things. Mojo magazine, I read my. I don't know if you know the magazine, but it's a British magazine. It's been around for, I don't know how long, 50 years, I think. I feel like I. There was a Joni Mitchell cover a couple issues ago that I think said 50 years on it. I, I. Oh, cool. Hey, Mojo, I don't really know how old you are. I apologize if I got that wrong. But, I mean, I read it cover to cover every month. Wow. And. And they are. I say that because they are kind of like, we converge on good taste in a way. And, you know, guess who's on the COVID this month? The Rolling Stones. Right. Like, you know, like every other year. And. But it is things that are worth following, you know, and, and oftentimes I discover things through that channel that I wouldn't have discovered otherwise. And that is why it's important to me that that is what Pitchfork. That's the role that pitchfor. Right. For a very long time. Less so today, unfortunately, but still sometimes. But it's kind of outside of scenes. The people that I think are the coolest or the smartest or whatever seem to generally trend towards. Even if they're coming from very different scenes, they seem to converge on similar types of stuff, which I find really interesting. The fact that Tyler Cowen can talk to Rick Rubin about music, granted, maybe they both just truly love music, but, like, the fact that those two guys who are very dissimilar, maybe they're similar in age, have converged. You and Rick is maybe less surprising. But. But I think Rick and I probably converge less than you might think. You know what I mean? Like, one of my favorite things to do when I visit him is to just sit and Play songs. And I've never heard most of the songs he plays me and he hasn't heard most of the songs that I play for him. Also, I was just talking to someone about this and we were talking about kind of where we come from. And that's actually why I went down the, the, the path of talking about the rock and roll first side because it's like you kind of have to see the arena rock to appreciate the punk rock. And. And also, like, I came from heavy metal, so I never got pop punk. And you know, that doesn't mean pop punk is bad. It just means that, like, if you, if you, if you were into like, you know, Britney Spears and then you discovered no effects, that makes sense to me. Right? Like, you know, whereas, you know, when I was. Since I came from, you know, heavy heavy, then, you know, I'm more likely, you know, so I think that we all just have this personal experience and, you know, you. That. That's why I think tier one to the individual is. Is really much more important for me. You know, all the music stuff, I did digital music for 20 years. And for me, what was important was that we enabled people to do whatever they wanted to do with music. I never wanted to be a music critic. There's a, There's a time for that. You're sitting with friends, you're like, I love this record. Have you heard it? You know you want. But like, what I loved about Winamp was you could just play anything you wanted to. And I don't care what you play. I just want you to love music. And so if you're loving it, that is, that is, that is fantastic. And I think that then the other side of it is like, it really should just be about sharing another. Another way to put this is no three star reviews. The only. Like whenever. Like that. That's what pisses me off about Rolling Stone. It's like, like every. You look through it, I don't know if it's still the case. I haven't looked at Rolling Stone in God knows how many years, but it used to be all three star reviews. And I'm like, you guys are three out of four or three out of five. Three out of five. Yeah. This is why I love the four star scale is you have to choose. You have to go thumbs up or thumbs down. Yeah. Which is all the. It's only if you're. If you really want to do me a favor. Yes. If it's three stars, just leave it out. Who cares? There's only two things I care about. One is I didn't know about it and it's awesome. Awesome. Please tell me about that. Yeah. The other is I might have wasted my time on it. I would in the old days would be. Wasted my money on it. Right. Like, in other words, like, if that new record from that artist that I was probably going to buy really sucks, please warn me those are the only two things you need to do. This is kind of okay. Like, I don't have time for that. You know, I'm too busy trying to find the good stuff. Right. About it. Man. Don't tell me. Don't tell me something is mediocre. What is the point? Totally agree. But I would also say don't tell me something is bad. God. Duh. Just tell me the good stuff. Really? Like, people just talking about shit they don't like. It's really, at this point, like, what is wrong with you? What's the point? Like, tell me stuff that. Tell me something that's worth watching. I agree. We talked about it, or at least we talked around it a lot. You've been a strong advocate that the Internet is maybe, way I put it in the past is like, it's about niche at scale. It's not about the mainstream. There's an idea that, that, that you, I think, talked about with Rick some. A couple of interviews ago, which is the Blockbuster versus the Snowball. I'd love to hear you just riff on that briefly because I thought it was one of the more interesting cuts on this. And it just, like, so, well, feels like it's every year that passes, it's describing modern culture better.
Ian Rogers 40:38 ↗
Yeah. And. And like the. All. All credit goes on. This goes to Umair Haque, who wrote this piece called the blockbuster versus a snowball. And I think 2003, really prescient. There was actually something that came before that. There was somebody around 2000 who basically was saying that the popularity of Fox News was due to the Internet. And the point was that, you know, if. When you only have. When you have limited distribution, you have two newspapers in a town that to get the most viewership, they're going to drift toward the middle. But the, the point was, you know, well, when you have unlimited choice, then you've got to stake out a position, I actually think. And John Higgs, who's my favorite author, he has a contemporary theory on this to kind of bring this all the way to today is. Is. And it. It really does. You know, you really do ask yourself, like, okay, how do you get the viewership right so again, limited distribution, two newspapers in a city, if you want the maximum viewership, you've got to be centrist, right? Well, now, on the Internet, if you want maximum viewership, what do you have to do? You have to be polarizing, right? And so I, like the way John put it, I find it actually very optimistic because what he's. What he says is, is like, those two centrist newspapers didn't really represent any of us, right? Because they were more centrist than any of us as human beings actually are. Now, his, his theory now is that media is so polarizing that it doesn't actually represent any of us. Oh, it's optimistic in that way. It's optimistic in that way where we were deluded prior into thinking, because I was going to say it was more optimistic when they were converged because we got to all believe we were really similar. But that was an illusion. Yeah, it was. It was an illusion. And by the way, I, you know, maybe it. Maybe that is a positive way to live. I mean, I fell for it, right? I mean, I grew up in, you know, all White Goshen Indiana, watching, you know, Sesame street and Different Strokes. And I really believed that, you know, we were all the same. And it took me, like, you know, moving to big cities, you know, to realize, like, that racism was real. You know what I mean? Like, I really. I didn't feel racism when I was growing up because media taught me it was over. So I agree. There's something positive in that. I was talking with one of my daughters. Oh, she was like, she made the comment like, you know, everyone's mad about Bad Bunny at the Super Bowl. And my, My thought was having the John Higgs thing in my head. My thought was, well, but are they like, in other words, like, if I walk out on the street right now and start asking people, are you upset about Bad Bunny at the Super Bowl? My guess is they're probably going to go like, like, no, Bad Bunny's cool, right? You know, but, you know, the, the. The polarizing algorithm, which is, which is polarizing by definition, right? Like, intentionally would make you think that everybody's bad about Bad Bunny at the Super Bowl. So what Umair had said in 2003 with the blockbuster versus the snowball is the way he put it was. It is media physics. I don't know. I don't know if that was his term or mine, but that was the way I thought about it in that, you know, and because you. We went from limited distribution to unlimited distribution, so the media I grew up with is limited distribution. There's only 13 channels on television. There's only so much FM spectrum. There's only so many magazines you can fit at the Hallmark store. You know, like that. Limited distribution. But the Internet is. I'm going to make, you know, Mr. Tatemyballs.com and guess what? I have, you know, I'm, I'm now meme-ific. Right. Like that's the, that's the unlimited distribution Internet. Yeah. Your TAM is 8 billion. Yeah, exactly. And, and so what, what Umair said is that, you know, in that we're in the old world, when you're making a movie, you know, especially in the 80s or, or 90s, you're. You're not trying to make Citizen Kane. You're trying to get people to go to theater A instead of theater B this weekend. So, so if you've got an extra $2 million, where do you invest it? Do you invest it into making the movie better or do you invest it into marketing? Right, you're going to put it into marketing because I just need people to go to theater A instead of theater B. And then his point was, you know, in the new world. And he said this in 2003, he really predicted House of Cards. Yes, I would say. Right, because he, he said it's, it's quality is hyper efficient, not market marketing. If you have the choice, you're going to put that money into making the product better because the only thing that actually works is word of mouth. And you're competing at a global level. This is Reed Hastings talking about Netflix completing with. Competing with sleep in a sense. Exactly. Yeah. And if you listen to the history of rock and roll and 500 songs, which I recommend, you'll hear him say every episode, if you enjoyed this show, please tell just one person. The best way for creative works to, you know, to, you know, to reach people is word of mouth. And that is definitely true today. I'm actually okay with that. Like, I think that that's not a. Not a terrible outcome. But I. You know what? Coming back to this is what I was going to say earlier when I started saying that about people enjoying whatever music they want. All I've ever wanted is efficiency. And that seems silly, but I grew up with like, like this pop music radio that, where I could, I could recite for you so many songs that I dislike. I know the whole song. I know all the lyrics. And then if you said, do you like that song? I would say, I hate that song. Right. And that's because we were just inundated because of limited distribution. We were inundated with things we didn't want to hear yet. There's incredible stuff that's not reaching us. And that inefficiency is always like. What I've wanted is. I've just wanted everybody, like, if you would like this, I want it to reach you. Kind of a beautiful cut on efficiency. Like. Yeah, yeah. It's a meritocratic. Yeah, in a sense. And if you don't like it, okay. I don't want to force it on you. I don't want you to listen to it until you like it. Except for Twisted Teens, you're not going to like it the first time, but by the 10th time, you will be hearing the melodies in your sleep. This happened to me. A couple. That happened to me with Yeezus, for sure. That happened to me. Did you listen to Cameron Winter? Winter, yes. Having to me initially with him, I was like, I don't. But I just couldn't. I think, by the way, I, I'm. I definitely, like, I agree with you on camera Winter. Those were genuine earworms. Really creative. I felt like the Camera Winter record is sort of like Astral Weeks for, you know, this year or something. Like, it had that kind of like. I didn't know when a song was over, you know, sort of feeling. Yeah. Like. Like on Astro Weeks. And I. I love the Geese record. I think, like, you know, the. I mean, the. The previous record I thought was great, but I felt like it was almost like a bunch of talented musicians in New York that were sort of like. Yeah. I was like, oh, well, that's the Radiohead reference. And that's the Thin. Thin Lizzy reference. And like, you could feel it. Yeah. The new record, I, I mean, the latest one. I, I mean, I know people love to hate on them. And I, I'm like, what are you talking about? This is genuinely challenging. Like, you put the most challenging song at the front of the record. I love that. That's like a wean move. And then the 1, 1 real, like, key is the guitar. Melodies get stuck in your head. Same for Twisted Teens, by the way. There's steel guitar. So you got two melodies. The guy, the guy who writes the songs, amazing melodies. And then you've got the steel guitar in the background. There's like this second melody. I think that's why you hear it in your sleep. It's really insidious. But. Yeah, the, the. But I, I. Yes, I think that, that, that thing, Yeezus, by the way, I hated that album when it came out. I've. That is. And it grew on you. Oh, yeah. I mean, it's. Yeah. Yeah. But I. I literally hated it. Like, I was like, kanye, this sucks. Can I tell you. Can you tell you my personal story with that record? First of all, I don't think I've ever said this publicly, but there's a project that I think that I would like to do. If anyone would like to do this with me, please contact me. I'm afraid I'm actually gonna have a lot of people contact me, because we all have stories. The book is called People who Tried to Help Kanye. I know at least a few. Yeah. Because he is truly, truly talented. Right. So the first time that. That I met Kanye, Guy Osiri asked me if I would come over to his house and talk to Kanye, because Kanye wanted. And it was. Guy was smart on this. He's like, I think what Kanye's trying to do is like, his grand royal, like, will you come talk to him? I'd love to. So Dark Twisted Fantasy had been out. I just, like, Dark Twisted Fantasy blew my mind. Yeah. Much more palatable on the first list. I think it's still. Yeah, true. And. But that's why the story's good, because. So I go over there and sit with Kanye. We have a pretty cool conversation. Interesting conversation, actually. One of the things, talking about boxes, he said, I feel like music is a box and I need to get out of it. He's like, I'm done. One thing. One funny thing from that meeting with him is he. He goes, yeah. I mean, I made a record that's a 10 out of 10 on Pitchfork. Dark Twisted Fantasy. He said, my punishment is that I have to do press and tour, you know? He's like, I made a record with Jay Z. He's like, there's nowhere to go from here but down. I was like, you made a record, Jay Z? He's like, yeah, you don't read the news? And I was like, no. Like, so you could put it on the timeline.
Because I guess he'd made the record and people were talking about it, but I didn't know about it. And the record wasn't out yet. This is Watch the Throne. I watch the Throne. Exactly. But I left Guy's house that day thinking Kanye is never going to make music again, because that's what he told me. He told me he wasn't going to make music anymore. Music is a box. He said when he was in Chicago, he felt like he was doing a box. He had to get out of the box. Music is a box. I've got to get out of the box. And I was like, wow. Wow. Kanye's not going to make music anymore. Wow. Okay. That's how I left. I left there believing and feeling that one day Mike D. told me, you know, Kanye's up in. That Rick's working on a record. Like, you know, Mike's in Malibu, Rick's in Malibu. And I was like, oh, really? Huh. I didn't think he was going to make music anymore. So the fact that what came out of that is Jesus makes perfect sense to me. As soon as they, like, you make them unlike you. Because kissing people's ass is so unlike you. Only rapper compared to Michael. I mean, Jesus is. It's punk rock. It is so punk rock. It is just from the moment it starts, like, it's hard, it's difficult, and. And he is as good an emcee on that record as almost ever. Although one Kanye thing. My daughter would be so bummed that I'm like. Like, big up in Kanye because, like, she's so disappointed with swastikas and. Yeah, you know, for good reason. Yeah, I think you can hold. There's nothing cool about a swastika, man. Like, dude, come on. But the. If you. If you're ever interested, like, there was a art of rap. I think it's called Search Art of Rap Kanye. And watch him do. He does a verse from Dark Twisted Fantasy. I promise, you never knew how good that verse was until you hear it acapella. I mean, wow. So anyway, yeah, I just wanted to say that Jesus is amazing. And that kind of Gmail account for the. For the book. Yeah, exactly. I mean, I know this is a controversial topic. It's not so controversial to me. Like, I have Sly Stone tattooed on my arm. Like, I. I like music and, you know, so I think, you know, we don't always. We don't always share political views with our. The. With our. With the people whose music we enjoy. Like, those are. Those are not. I. I don't know. Those are strange bedfellows.
Host 52:32 ↗
Do you think I'll ever make anything that good again?
Ian Rogers 52:38 ↗
I don't know. I mean, I hope so, but I don't know. I mean, I think that this is. This. I mean, it's not. Not for me to. Not really for me to pontificate on. To me, the more interesting question there is, like, how does kind of the machinery interfere with. With the art? You know, And I think there's. That. That's a lot of the story, right? I mean, so a. There's. There's personal issues. You know, he's, you know, he's, you know, he's a human being with his own issues at the same time. Then there's like, everything's running. That's why I think the. The. The people who tried to help Kanye book, which. Which is a. Which is a joke, obviously. But I also think that that's one of the things that I find sad about it because there's so many people that. That really believed in his genius, that wanted to help and. And, you know, that just couldn't. Yeah. And that's. That's. That's. That's unfortunate.
Host 53:34 ↗
I want to talk briefly about brand. We. We briefly met in early 2020, and I was building this gaming thing, and there's this line you said that stuck with me for years and years. Um, and I don't even know if we totally followed the advice as much as we should have, but you said, never forget you're selling culture, not product. What does that actually mean?
Ian Rogers 53:56 ↗
Well, I think that selling culture is a prerequisite to selling product is sort of the way that I thought about it. And I really loved working at LVMH to see that the great thing about LVMH brands is that in some ways, they're caricatures of brands. And what I mean by that specifically is I work with Dr. Martens today, and you could be excused for saying, well, there's a lot of utility in what we sell. Right? It's a black boot, it's comfortable. I. You know what I mean? Like, there's. And, and, but, but. But that's actually like, you're kind of doing yourself a disservice when you do that because you're missing. You're. You're missing the real reason that that motivates someone to buy something. There's a. There's a great human being, David Slew, who. Who worked with Tony Fadell for a very long time, still works with Tony, and he taught me something about. About consumer electronics, which is that the front of the box is for the heart, the back of the box is for the head. Right? And so, you know, the front of the box is that lizard brain. Like, I want that. Yeah. Oh, that's cool. Shiny object, right? The back of the box is. I've got to justify to my partner why I spent, you know, $500 on this. Well, look, it's got blood. It's got blood. It's got this feature, and it's got that feature. Look, it's a great buy, you know, and, and, and so I think. But it's that same thing, right? You're selling the part that touches you first. Right. And then once you've crossed that barrier, well, now I can sell you the product.
Host 55:35 ↗
It's also funny, it's telling that Apple products have very little on the back of the box.
Ian Rogers 55:38 ↗
Yeah, yeah. Well, I mean the Apple, the Apple, the Apple thing over the past 20 years is just crazy. Yeah, you could, you couldn't have. I mean, in fact, the, like that's a 20 years interesting timeline to look at it. Because if you'd have told me in 2006 that if you'd have described the iPhone to me, you'd have said there's a mostly proprietary platform that's going to take 30%, you know, from anybody who wants to have an app on their platform. I would have said that's not the Internet. You know, the Internet is like open and available to anyone and we're about open source and we're about to about, you know, open access and blah, blah, blah. And I just would have bet against it. I'd have bet against it all day long and obviously I'd have been very wrong. But yeah, I think it's a, there's so many, so many lessons. Lessons in that. I think though that the bigger lesson in, in Apple is the, the Clayton Christensen one. The, you know, the, when the technology is not yet good enough, the integrated solution always wins. And they had that combination of software and hardware that, that, you know, a company like Sony never knew how to do.
Host 56:52 ↗
The funny thing is that I would agree with you and there's this classic, I don't know if you ever read, Ben Thompson has this piece, what Clayton Christensen got wrong about the Apple, not about the iPhone not getting compressed from the bottom. And, and basically it was almost both of those things.
Ian Rogers 57:07 ↗
Yeah, it's really unlikely thing to your point in so many ways. No, I mean, and by the way, like, it's super personal for me because when I was at Yahoo in the 2000s, you know, we were, our kind of, our whole MO was yeah, yeah, yeah, Apple's killing it right now, but the disintegrated solution comes next. Right? And so like, you know, I took the trip to Japan with Dave Goldberg in 2005 to try to convince Sony to join Yahoo and Microsoft on the fight against, you know, the disintegrated solutions that were going to, you know, ultimately overtake the ipod. But I think that that's actually what Apple. I think it Is Clayton Christensen. I would love to talk to Ben about this because what Clayton Christensen says is the integrated. When, when the technology is not yet good enough, the integrated solution wins. As the technology becomes better, the integrated solution must move up market to solve bigger problems. Now I think that they did create a lock in with. With FaceTime. You know, I. With FaceTime iMessage AirDrop, which has prolonged that like, you know, and that, that's probably the lesson is that there are ways of, you know, of creating network effects that create locking. Well, and frankly, to go back to the question, like, it's also a cultural object. It is a. Like how much of it is imessage and how much of it is having an iPhone? Like you could debate. I'm sure, I'm sure it depends on the person. But the fact that they've created a product that ultimately is like a vanity object in some sense and this ultimate utility object is kind of strange.
Host 58:47 ↗
Also on the brand note, you've kind of classic line, maybe it's from you or maybe it's from Arnaud, but storytelling plus time equals value. I thought about this a lot and I thought about this a lot while we were building this gaming thing. 100 Thieves in part because we had so much of the brand was we had the brand and then we had all these influencers and creators underneath it. We live in the age of the individual in so many ways. How can brands accumulate value or maybe accumulate meaning in a way that people can't? Because it's so much easier for Mr. Beast to get the low hanging fruit of attention compared to a brand or a label whatever whatever. And Mr. Beast is an individual, not a brand in this conversation.
Ian Rogers 59:29 ↗
Well, so this introduced an interesting sub question which is notably, Perhaps most of LVMH's signature brands were originally namesakes. And so maybe there's an element of that, but I don't know. The metaphor I always use is like it's really cool that Louis Vuitton is like this camera and Virgil can hold that camera for a little while and then Pharrell can come in and hold that camera or whoever. Jonathan Anderson comes in and holds the Dior camera and you get a. It's Dior, it's super Dior and it's Jonathan. To me, Mr. Beast is not that. Maybe at some point you, you talked with Rick Rubin about this at one point where you're like, could this be done with the Beatles or with Daft Punk or something? But it seems very few new brands are being created. It seems to me and it almost feels like brands have this lineiness that you can't even. Like there's the. I realize this is a very convoluted question, but there's this tension between if your goal is to succeed in the near term or even the medium term, you're way better building around a single individual. If your goal is to last 10 years or 100 years, you're way better having a brand or a label or whatever.
I love this question. I don't find it convoluted. I think it is that challenging of a question. I think actually maybe it always starts around an individual. And I think that you're right that I think there's always few brands that get created relative to the number of people who try. It's just like music where you're always going to have more aspirants than you have success stories. And the winners are maybe also somewhat unlikely. It has to do with timing, has to do with other things. In other words, you're right. The brands that you're talking about probably did start out as individuals and then over time they live on. You know, like I had that conversation with Rick and I. I really. I would love to see people do this with, with music. Probably harder with music than a product.
Ian Rogers 1:01:28 ↗
Yeah. I think though that like, you know, for example, the Beatles is just a great example where, you know, that, that the Beatles could come to represent love, you know, like, like they could, they could be just spreading love and joy. Right? It's. And, and also, yeah, I mean, Louis Vuitton gone a long time. Dior gone a long time. Christian Dior gone a long time. Yet the brands are bigger than ever. So first of all, I think there is something mechanical to that. You know, if you look at, you know, brand marketing for a great brand, and I would say Louis Vuitton's interesting. Right. Which is. Which are there more people of. In the world, people who love Louis Vuitton or dislike Louis Vuitton? It actually might be dislike. I don't know the answer to the question, to be honest. And that's not a diss at all. I'm just saying that that's okay. You have to remember that Ben, I don't know, is the wealthiest man in Europe and probably 85% of the population are not his customers. Right. So that's okay. Like, you don't need to. You, you, you. The goal is not to appeal to everyone. Right. The goal is to appeal strongly his product especially. So. Yeah. But I think for all brands, I don't, I Don't think even when, look, even when this to go back to Mr. Beast, perhaps this is the tension and also I. Mr. Beast doesn't appeal to everyone, but he's trying to. I don't know, Izzy, I would, I, I'm not sure. I gotta look when, when the most popular, it's like, oh, everybody loves Britney Spears. You know, like when I was running Yahoo Music. But still, if we put her on the homepage, like less than 30 of people would click, right? You put a picture of a dog and a cat hugging on the homepage and 70% of people would click right. So I just think it culturally, like culture never appeals to everyone. You know, great Seth Godin quote. If you should find yourself a nickel anytime you use the word everyone or nobody because the moment you say it, every word that comes after it is wrong. Right? It's not true. There's never an every. There's nothing's for everyone. Nothing's for nobody. And so then you're, what you're, you know, what you're doing is you're trying to, to make a business out of what you love to do. I always point to satisfy because I've had a, like a close up view of watching Bree spill satisfy running. And he's just had incredible patience. Way more than I would have had if I were doing it. He has, he had a great, great thing. I heard him say to another brand, a young brand owner recently where he said, look, if you think now's your time, then you already missed your window. You're. You always, as the brand, you always have to have in mind that your time is tomorrow, your time is yet to come. And I just thought that's such an amazing way of, of looking at it. Because what that means is that you have an expansive vision and you know, it can go somewhere else. The other is like when you look at the marketing of a Louis Vuitton and you look at, you go, well look, they do magazines, they do outdoor, they do online, they do Google shopping, they do all this. What works? You know, where's the leverage? And when you do the research, the answer is everything. You know, at different levels. Of course they all have different roi, but they all have positive roi, which means it's literally a machine where you, you put money into the marketing and it makes the brand bigger for tomorrow. And, and that, and so I would argue that nothing is compromising tomorrow. Yeah, exactly. And, and so you, and you have to have that very long time horizon. I think the biggest problem that people have is they they don't really understand what it means to build a brand. And building a brand is like building an artist. You know, artists are rarely popular in their lifetime. Well, I mean, look, Golden Goose is a. Is a great example. I was introduced to Golden Goose through Virgil. Right. Because Virgil was a Golden Goose fan. I didn't know Golden Goose before. I don't know the exact numbers. I. I think I've. I think I maybe talked about it on Rick's podcast, but they, you know, there. It was a slow go for 15 years. Like, let's say it. Let's say it took 12 to 15 years to get to 20 million. Just roughly. I don't know if it's 15 or 20 or. Yeah, but like, you know, order of magnitude. And then over the next 15 years, it went to 500 million deep in the compound, you know. Yeah, exactly. So. But I think that, to me, that's also generational. Right? It's. It's like it. It kind of takes a generation to prove itself, and then you can't grow too fast. You can. It's impossible. So anyone who thinks there was an entrepreneur who started a fashion brand here in Paris a few years ago, and I sat next to her, she's a good friend, but I sat next to her at a. At a dinner, you know, and I, you know, the brand was going, okay, but. And I was like, you know, how are things going? And she said, there's something you said to me when I was raising money that rings in my head every day. And I was like, oh, my God, I'm so sorry. What was it? And she said, you said to me, fashion brands are not venture businesses. And what I meant by that was, you know, venture has a certain time horizon, but to build a brand. And I don't think it's fashion brand. I think it's brand. This is like a generation. Like, and you're not really there until a Virgil can say, yo, that was my shit when I was 15. Like, that's how long it takes. Yeah. You know, it's almost like 10 years is the. You know, it's not even a conversation until you're 10 years. It's not even a conversation you have to have. Yeah. One. One other. Look at the row. Mary Kate and Ashley, who took them seriously. They had to stick around long enough that people were like, I guess you guys aren't going away. You know? And then it's like, oh, well, now we can look at the quality. Right? Before it was the gimmick. Before it was a gimmick. And like, maybe you got luck and like, I'm sure you can't do it again next year. Yeah. But after that, like 15 year mark, people are like, you know, yeah, it looks like you guys know how to do this, you know, and so I just think that that's human nature also, by the way. And I'll tell you, like, you know, knowing Breeze at satisfy, I mean, I talked to Breeze today because I talked because I knew he was going to go to the Kevin Morby show last night. I was like, how was the show? He was like, oh, I gave my tickets away. I was in the office till 11. He's 11 years in on this brand. Right. And you find me somebody that works harder than Bree. They don't exist. Right. And like people, people discount that. People think like, oh, well, he's just like, you know, how, how hard can it be to make running shorts? You know, like, how hard can it be? But no, he's like steering that ship 247 with a singular vision that, you know, no matter if it was up or down yesterday, it's on tomorrow. You know, like, people don't, most people simply don't have what it takes for people like that. Obviously him at a, at a very kind of targeted focus level. Maybe someone like Bernard, Bernard Arnault, at the kind of like, larger scale.
The defining trait, at least as you're describing it, as patience. I think that sounds right. When and how. My assumption is certainly from Bernard, but probably for Breeze too, is that there's a intensity and aggression that shows up amidst the patients, for sure. Is that true? And if so, yeah. How does that, how does that show up?
Ian Rogers 1:08:41 ↗
I think that's a, that's a, that's a great, like, what a unique combination of traits. Right? And that's why I, I kind of look at them with a lot of awe because I don't have the patience, you know, and also I think partly coming from tech, that, that, that's a, you know, like where, you know, doesn't love history or time. I mean, look at what we've been through in AI this year where it's like we went from token maxing to token economizing in 30 days. Right. Like, the whiplash is severe in our industry. And also, by the way, that's why a lot of those kind of people have a very difficult time in this industry. Right? Like, you're either, you know, not everyone's not built for everything. I realized that just being a startup and I've done 13 startups and what I realized is I'm kind of built for it. You know, I'm built for like, guess what? I'm coming in tomorrow, working hard and I don't care if yesterday was. I'm coming in today with a smile on my face and I'm telling everybody everything's going to be great. Right? Like, they're not. Everybody is built, is, is built for everything. But I, I think that, yeah, those people that are, that are great at, at a brand they, they do have. And Jonathan Anderson is certainly one of those people where he has all of the creativity, but he's also, he's competitive, he's intense, he's hard working. Like those are, you know, there is definitely a special mix of traits that makes people great in that, in that world. And like, you know, there are very few people that really have it. You know, the, you know, the Galliano's and the Jonathan Andersons and the Breece Partouches are few and far between.
I think you said you aren't patient. My sense is that in some sense you are definitely impatient, but in another sense you've actually been like very patient, particularly on the technology side. You've had the right level of patience to see out maybe things that felt inevitable to you but certainly weren't inevitable on an obvious time horizon, not the least of which crypto and streaming music or Internet music really like you basically wrote Internet music for, for 15 years, maybe longer.
Ian Rogers 1:10:41 ↗
Yeah. Do you? Yeah. I don't know. I, I, how do you. You clearly are a patient in some dimension that, that's maybe the, the obvious one because, you know, it's, it's. But, but also I think there's just personal things in that. Right. Like it, I didn't know how to do a business at all. Right. So the fact that someone wanted to pay me to make websites was just like, okay, great. Right. And then, and all this dot com stuff was happening and I was like, what's going on? Like, I don't even know what public company means. You know, I, that's not part of, you know, my mom, you know, worked in a factory and then became a nurse and my dad was a, was a fireman. Like we didn't have like investments in public companies in my family really. You know, I didn't know what it even meant. So I just never had that like, you know, I just didn't know what, what else and you know, so what was I doing?
You did it for another 12 years after you had already.
Ian Rogers 1:11:32 ↗
Right. But the, so then before the do, during the Dot com bubble, I was making music apps. After the dot com bubble, I was making music apps simply because I didn't know how to do anything else. And I was just passionate about it, I think, to be honest. But, but let's say Yahoo, you're trying to do it. Y. You're trying to $5 all you can eat subscription music. You're trying to do Spotify at Yahoo in 2002. 2004. 2004. And then you guys sell to Beats or to sell to Apple. Excuse me. In 2013. My sense is it wasn't like that was the only thing you could do for the next. Yeah, but eight years. Yeah, that's a, it's a, it's a good question. I wouldn't say it was patience, though. I think it was because it was at the time it was frustrating. You know, like when I was at Yahoo Music and I'm arguing with Lior Cohen about music streaming rights, like, that wasn't patience, that was genuinely frustrating.
You have a great thing on your blog about the, the context talk. Yeah. 2007 or 2008. It's kind of like right in the middle of that period, you're like, come on, people, that, that one keeps coming back to me. The, the content versus context thing.
Ian Rogers 1:12:33 ↗
Yeah, that's a, that I was definitely onto something there. That is like, I didn't realize that I would still be thinking about that one today. Yeah, but, yeah, the, the. Well, another way to look at it is like I've, I've always just tried to find like, what's the technology people are going to hate next? You know, from like, you know, file sharing to, you know, to streaming to crypto to now AI like, what's the technology people are gonna be really angry about tomorrow. How do I get into that one? That was never intentional. I just like new disruptive things. And it turns out that new disruptive things are often disliked. But I mean, look, music is. And obviously I talk a lot about music here because it's the only thing I'm qualified to talk about. I'm genuinely qualified to have a conversation about music. The rest of it, I'm sort of armchair, armchair historian. But, but I. So I think that's why the music one makes a lot of sense. And also I, I, that's why I'm very lucky that, that I got to come work at lvmh because I'd also reached a level in the music business. I had three nice outcomes in, in music, which is, you know, that's what people look for. People that have won before, and I'd won a couple times.
You kind of did it. I mean, from my perspective, I.
Ian Rogers 1:13:50 ↗
I did what I wanted, what I set out to do. Like, I built this thing in college that was a streaming. You search for music and you could stream it. And it was the early 90s, and then in 2015, it was on every iPhone. I couldn't have been more proud. I was like, that's a career. I've had, a career. I could be done now, and I would be. I'd be quite satisfied with what I did.
That's my point, is you were patient enough to see that through. Whether or not it was fully.
Ian Rogers 1:14:14 ↗
I would say, lucky enough to see that through, really, because it was not my idea. It was Dr. David Fenske at the Indiana University Music Library who gave me a job with the task of move the reserve listing materials to, you know, from behind the desk to workstations throughout the library. I kept doing that over and over for a lot of years. There were a lot of people who cared way more about my career than I did. John Silva, probably Mike from the BC Boys, Jim Evans, Dave Goldberg, Rob Lord, and ultimately Jimmy. I remember Jimmy calling me. I was locked out of my own house and sitting on my back steps. My phone rings. It's a 310 number. I answer it, Jimmy, Ian, what are you doing? Ian, you're a major league player. Why are you playing in the minors? And like, oh, Jimmy. I'm like, I work my ass off at my startup, man. Like, why don't you just buy my startup? Why are you being mean to me? I'm already locked out of my house. D. Dude, like, why are you yelling at me? He's like, you're. Get out of the minor leagues. You know, but my point is, is like, Jimmy saw something in me that I didn't see. Yeah. So that's why I would say I was lucky to be able to do it much more than I was, you know, visionary or. Or. Or patient. I had. I had something. And. And I think that that is. I. I really have a lot of pride in that, because I think one of the things that Jimmy Iovine and. And Ben, I don't know, share is they see something in people. You know, it was. It was, you know, the story of Ben, I don't know, hiring John Galliano is that, you know, Galliano comes into his office, as it was described to me. It was leather vest, no shirt, dreadlocks, flip flops. Mr. Arnault's assistant tries to send him away and Mr. Arnault's like, no, no, no. I've heard good things about this guy. Send him in. Mr. Arnault hires him on the spot. You know, I watched the, you know, Tom Petty and Bruce Springsteen documentaries, and you see Jimmy yelling at them, and it makes. Gives me, like, a pit in my stomach because I know what it's like to be yelled at by Jimmy. But then I'm like, hey, I was yelled at by Jimmy, too. And that's what Jimmy does, is he takes people that he thinks have promise and he gets them to do things that even they didn't know they were capable of. And so the fact that people like Jimmy Iovine. And Benotto. No. Have, like, tapped me on the shoulder and said, hey, I think you can do more, that's kind of like the real. The real honor.
I think you are someone who's spent your career communicating these new technologies that. That might be inevitable in some sense, but are certainly not here yet to the world. And I think you've done a good job of communicating, particularly outside of the existing kind of community. It's in my sense, is that while there are some notable exceptions, most people in the technology world are decidedly bad at this, at talking to the rest of the world. Yeah. Why do you think that is? And what do you think has made you good at it?
Ian Rogers 1:17:25 ↗
I mean, it's really funny in AI these days, right? Like, you're. I feel like, you know, like, you would think that, like, the AI people, they should start with, like, let me tell you why this is going to benefit humanity. And then. And then, like, once I've told you, like, look, this is going to be incredible for. For, you know, for learning. It's going to bring new opportunities to, you know, people around the world that didn't have them before. Like, once we've gotten through all that we can. And also there are some risks. And then let's talk about those risks. And seems like the. The. The heads of the frontier labs have just gone the other route now, started to change the tone, but, man. Yeah, yeah. Sam has started to reverse course a bit. And, you know, maybe part of it is they were just. Weren't talking to anyone. Like, Sam was writing these blog posts in 2018, and nobody. Yeah, nobody was listening. And. Yeah, yeah. So, But I think. I think for me, like, first of all, I've always worked with artists, and that's also easier. Right. It's like, I want to help your artistic vision come to life. This is in service of that. Yeah, it's in service of that. And that can't possibly be wrong. You know what I mean? There's no way it can be wrong. It's a beautiful thing about art. Art is an incredible shield. Right. As soon as you've said it's art, it automatically doesn't appeal to everyone. And so it doesn't matter if you like it or not. So. So I think that that's one thing also. The punk rock thing does come into it a bit because for me, technology has always been. I've always been interested in empowerment through technology. And I don't mean that in some, like, corny political way. I just mean, like, I didn't have a voice and I didn't have a way to reach the people that might like what I do. And now I do. You know, that's what I mean through root by that. And those things are. Are like, quite easy to. To explain in a way. And they're also easy to identify with if you're talking to the right people. You know, I always say that, like, if you ever made a fanzine with a Sharpie and a photocopier, then you understood the Internet the moment you saw it, you know, but that's not everybody, you know, But I. Those are the people that I talk to. You know what I mean? I. I'm like, hey, look, you can. Those weren't obvious tech people. Yeah, critically. Right, exactly. But they were people that were. That, that. That still kind of got. Were primed to get it. Yeah, they were primed to get it. Exactly. They were, they were. They were primed to get it. I do think that's a very key part of my worldview. And I realize this more as I get older because I think that where I, where I, where I really don't connect with people is when. Because if people sort of think about, like, mass culture, then there's no way for me to get my message across. And we're probably not going to relate to one another either. It's back to the guys talking about when we're going to go back to the center. Yeah, exactly. Like, that's, that's kind of like. But I think that that's probably true. Like, I grew up, like, mail ordering records and, and watching, you know, skateboard videos on vhs. Right. So therefore, the Internet, like, spoke to me. Now, if you loved, like, top 40 radio, right? Then you were the person that was like, like, why do we need the Internet? Right, Right. And so I think that's the other. That's the other part of it to me. And I've. I heard a great quote. Sal Khan from Khan Academy was on David Eagleman's podcast last year. He did like a two parter on AI and education, which was super good. And Sal Khan just said this offhanded remark that I think about every day, which is he said Khan Academy is great for the 15% of people who are curious. And there's some other stat, I'm going to get it precisely wrong. But the idea you'll get, which is that, you know, I can't remember the numbers. 85% of people die within 20 miles of where they were born. Yep. Okay, so does this mean that 85 of people are NPCs? You know, on some level that like, if you're not a curious person. Yeah. Right. Then, then the things I say probably aren't going to appeal to you. So I think that that world is motivation constrained for sure. Exactly. We've gotten. I struggle with this though because on one hand Balaji has this thing he talks about. It's like the Ramanujan problem, which is Ramanujan happened to be. Is this mathematician who was kind of Einstein like brilliant person and he happened to be discovered in India by some British professor and it was like pure luck that he got pulled out and turned out to be an Einstein like figure. And biology's Ragin problem is like, how do we make sure all those people are discovered? It's kind of your thing, which is 15%, but they're not even. Yes, it's efficiency. Conversely though, like there's a. This relates to the agency thing, which is like, maybe there's agentic people and there's non agentic people. Although my theory is that it's actually closer to like Elon Musk is a 10 out of 10 on agency and a lot of people are 1. But you sit somewhere on the gradient and critically, at least one of the things that gets me excited about technology and media and so many other things is that you can move people up. Like going and living San Francisco in San Francisco will raise your bar. And so I totally agree with you on one hand. Like, just look at the numbers. It's so clear that Khan Academy, like access to education is no longer the bottom. There's some wrinkles here. You need to have an interconnection. You need to be able to have the time to study whatever, but it's not how it used to be. And I'm like, man, are we just going to let 85% of people, like I want to go shake them. Yeah, that's my monologue. But no, I, I agree with you, you know, but I mean, you know, you, you, we know this in, in our lives in so many ways, right? Like, you can't help somebody who doesn't want to be helped. Yeah. My positive model for humanity is that every single one of us has magic and imperfection. And then the other side of that is you choose what to see. You know, I had a, you know, you have a super frustrating experience in a coffee shop or a airport or whatever, right? And you can choose to see the imperfection or you can choose to see the magic in that moment. And for me, like, one of, you know, my practices in life is to see the magic, and I think we need that. The place we need that the absolute most is, like, in our personal lives and with our partners and our business partners. You know, I mean, look, I've. I've been divorced twice, right? And you. If you're, if you're looking for something, you're gonna find it, right? And so if what you want to see in me is the imperfection, there are plenty of them. Yeah, you're going to find them all day long. If you want to see the magic, it's there too. And, and you can, you know, so you really. It's like we, we all choose. So I, I think that on that 85% thing, I think that is how we bring it out of people, right? Is by seeing their magic and pointing them at their magic. Yeah, yeah, totally. And I think that's where education is important too, and where, you know, the way that we educate, you know, that we are. The fact that we're still educating people for industrial industrialization is huge disservice. The fact that we aren't investing in different kinds of education, the fact that only the rich are going to get to go to Alpha School, like, you know what I mean? These are, I think these are some of the biggest. These are where we just have a really simple choice as society. We know that, you know, investing in education leads to a more successful society like the. And I think this is what creates the 85% percent problem. Because if you, if you are resourceful, then you're like, well, I'm not learning what I want to learn in school, but the best time ever for me, look at this Khan Academy. I can get, I can do everything. I can, like, learn all this stuff I didn't know before, you know, but yeah, I think the, the education is probably the only actual path out of what you just said.
Why are you so into Interfaces, Maybe you wouldn't put it that way, but there is a through line of your career that is maybe the LVMH side a little less so. But it seems that your particular cut on technology is like, I'm going to help people. Maybe part of it is that it's these obscure technologies that aren't quite ready yet. But, yeah, I think that, I think that, you know, the best example of this is like, when I, When I came here to Ledger and I, I told Tony Fadell, you know, I'm going to go run the consumer business at Ledger. And he said, said, there is no consumer business that's not B to C. It's B to G business to geek. And your job is to build a consumer business. So that speaks to what you just said, which is like, you're going in early y. When there is no interface. I mean, when I started building for the web, there were no background colors, there was no css, there was no layout. It was like an image was a character in, like, you know, you, you laid it out like, as if you could lay out the letter A or you could lay out a J, you know, a gate, gif, not even a jpeg. So I think when you're starting in those days, then you're like, now you're, you're in the business of building a better ui. Yeah. You know, it's just kind of what. You're in what you're in the business of whether you want to be or, or, or, or not. But also, I think since you are trying to, like, bring the technology to more people, you know, I, I think it's hilarious that, like, when we thought we were doing big stuff at Yahoo in the early 2000s, and we had, you know, the number one music video service before YouTube and the number one radio service before Pandora, you know, we were like, we're, we're huge. Right? But like, you're just getting people to listen to music on a Windows PC. Like, what kind of interface is that compared to. I remember the first time that I heard that people were like, just driving to work with Pandora on in their car. You can't imagine how absurd that sounded. You're like, wait, first of all, you're getting that good a bandwidth to your car? Like, whoa. Second of all, what's your data plan, dude? Like, like, can you do that for what, two days? And. And then it's over? Like, you know, I mean, that was just insane. Yeah, the kids are never gonna know how good. Yeah, it's just like, man, the fact That I can like download Lossless, you know, while I'm walking to work is just. I remember counting text messages. Oh, my God. Brutal. Yeah, I mean, it's, it's, yeah, people, it's people can't, can't remember, can't understand. But yeah, so I think when you're in those days, then you're in the business of interface, right? Because, I mean, I can't even tell you. Like, I, I built like, music app, just trying to play a song on like an old flip phone. We're talking like 2002, you know, like a phone that, like, what they call it wet, you know. You know, so. And, but you know, at that point though, you are like, okay, I don't even say it's interface. You're at that point, you're just like, can I make it work? Like, is it possible? But yeah, that's. And I like that part of it. Like, I feel like we're there with AI right now and I'm, I'm, I'm having more fun right now than ever in my career. But a lot of it is like, like, can this work? And then, you know, you know, it's funny, like, we're talking with one of the guys on the team yesterday because we're finding things in cursor that are just don't work at all. And you're like, this company just sold the SpaceX for 60 billion and you know what I mean? But we're just in such the early days, you know, we're. Yeah, it's so new. We're. We're in. And by the way, you, you have. On one end of the spectrum, you have a thing that doesn't work at all. On the other end of the spectrum, you have the craziest capacity that has, like, ever been had ever. Like, and you can't even imagine that it's. That it's real. Which kind of explains why some of the things might not work. Yeah, well, I mean, this is, this is just like where we've been with AI for a while and you know, where, where you're like, how can you be so stupid and so outrageously smart now? You know, the outrageously smart is like, you know, starting to really dominate the feeling. Right? Whereas a year ago, but a year ago, it wasn't at all. I mean, I remember, you know, coding with AI last summer super well, and it was like, so frustrating. Like, fist on mouse, like, oh, what are you doing? Why did you do that? And, and then it was, you know, end of last year that it became like, no way. Wow. Yeah, get on. Wow. Hang on. Yeah, well, I want to talk about the agent stuff, but maybe first on the kind of broader theme of Ledger and crypto, we talked about that old piece about convenience and your kind of argument is like, convenience. There's so much hubris. Like you have to trust that people ultimately are going to go where the thing is convenient. It seems to me that consumers have voted with their feet, certainly against privacy and to a lesser extent against security, in favor of convenience. Ledger almost by definition is a product that is about offering, hopefully offering you a fair amount of convenience, but really saying like security is. We're going to be almost ideological. How do you think about that? Like, how is that the, the, the, the, the. Depending on who you ask. In crypto for the last, and, and Maybe soon in AI, like for the last 10 years, there's always been the people who say we're going to find a way and the other people are just saying, like, there's just no way everybody's going to have a hardware wallet. I don't think we've ever thought that everybody's going to have a hardware wallet. Again, like, find yourself a nickel anytime you use the word everybody, right? And also remember that, that the richest man in Europe is not trying to address the majority of the market. So that's never been my vision. My vision has always been that it's a very big sky and you want to make the premium product and you want, and a. It's just better business. Right? Like leading people down the wrong path is ultimately bad business. Business, you know, so if you're, if you're making a software wallet and convincing people that it's secure and you're kind of leading them into danger, then ultimately they'll get wrecked. And that's just a bad way to have a consumer relationship. And I also think that like, you know, the, the strength of Ledger has been that it's always, it has been ideological, that there's, you know, no compromise on security or self custody. Those are like the two tenants. And it's really handy to have those because there are lots of times over the last 12 years, we're kind of the only company in crypto that's been saying exactly the same thing for 12 years. Right? Like the wind blows. People move from this to that. There's lots of things that we could have done. You know, we could have done software wallets, we could have done mpc, you know, but we've always said, look, that doesn't meet our security Standards, standards and also doesn't mean our self custody standards. We've said if we stick to those two things, we think that those things, there's a cohort that will always find those things valuable. Interestingly, the choices that we made on those play perfectly into now where digital security needs to go broadly because that's another lens on it would be to say that actually what Ledger is, is it's a digital security company with where crypto was the need for digital security. So what is Ledger really? It's a, it's a piece of hardware with a secure element chip in it. So it's the same chip that's in your credit card or your passport. The one that's in your credit card protects the secrets of the bank. The one that's in your passport protects the secrets of the government from you. By the way, that's the point, like you're not supposed to have access. And the one that's in your ledger protects your secrets. So you have secrets as an individual. If you think you don't have secrets, then please email me the password to your email. I'd be happy to see it because I know you don't have secrets. So just email me your password to your email and I'll be happy to validate the fact that you don't have any secrets for you. We all have secrets, right? And we deserve a right to privacy. Privacy is, is normal. And that's fundamentally what Ledger does. It uses this technology that was created to protect secrets from us and it uses it for us. It's as if your credit card has an operating system which is over the air upgradable and you can load arbitrary apps on so you can make security applications. So you know, if you build this level of security 12 years ago, 2014, what's the application, you know, for that ledger of the. For. I'm sorry for that level of security. And that's where, you know, bitcoin was the first and then other digital assets come after that. And by the way, I'm still a bitcoin bull. I'm still a digital art bull. You know, like these things mean a lot to me for the same reason that they did, you know, 10, 10 years ago. And you know, but there's, there's also, if you think about it as the only operating system and open development environment on top of smart card technology on the planet, then in a, in an era where, you know, it's funny because last October I stood on stage here in this building in Paris and I said an agentic future is coming. And an agentic future where you give your passwords, your identity and your credit card to an agent is a security nightmare. And it was just crickets. Like, nobody. I heard. I was gonna say October was like, right before. Yeah, nobod. Nobody heard me. And now this year you've got Marc Andreessen running around saying, we are poised for a computer security apocalypse. Right, yeah. Mythos is gonna. Yeah, yeah, exactly. So here we are, you know, in the computer security apocalypse. So having a, A, you know, a, A better security solution, you know, having, in other words, an operating system, an open development environment on top of smart card technology is extremely valuable. Valuable. You build something with that sort of ideology and then you've. You end up finding different, different use cases for it. Right. I mean, why, why did you. Why this from lvmh? That whole, that whole ideology story is great. Hopefully somebody's going to build it. Ledger was already going like, yeah, we, you know, for me, Covid had had something to do with it because I actually, my story on this is quite specific in that, that, you know, there's. There's someone in my office at Topspin, Parker, Todd Brooks, who told me about Bitcoin very early. I took a look at it and I was like, this is amazing. But like, the government, Governments won't allow this to exist. That was my take, you know, but that means. Actually I went deep on it enough to like, yeah, have that feeling. Oh, yeah, this, like, I was like, I get this. And this threatens sovereignty warranty. Right. And so that will be. I mean, I've lived through like, Napster Gnutella. I'm like, they can shut that down. And my lesson from Napster Gnutella wasn't like, you can stop the code, but you can stop any business from being in the business of this. Yes. Right. So I can't stop, you know, the government can't stop Gnutella, they can't stop Pirate Bay, but they can say that, hey, guess what? You're not in the business of Gnutella or Pirate Bay. So that was kind of my take on it. Then there was a point which it got kind of like big enough where I was like, this is going to be hard to stop. Like, this is big enough. And that to me was around like 2013, 2014 is like, kind of when I felt that. And I bought the, like, programming bitcoin book. The, the. And like, I came at it from like a developer mindset. But, you know, I was like, still like, well, you know, okay, we'll, we'll like, kind of see what this does. But during COVID I was like, this is it. Like, the technology's here. The technology is good enough. We had these ideas about smart contracts and stuff, but, like, now it actually exists, you know, and, you know, you've the money. Money printer is like, fully on. Like, we were in. I remember, you know, the, the CFO of, of LVMH telling me, yeah, we are in unprecedented territory. Wow, 2 trillion of stimulus in the US a trillion in Europe or whatever the numbers were. But, like, no one knew what comes next. It's never been done before. Like, what are we looking at here? But I, I was just like, oh, yeah, this is the time. And by the way, we were right. You know, you look at 20, 21, you know, here at Ledger, we just couldn't keep the product in stock. You know, it was. It was. It was so crazy. And you had all of these, like, other narratives. You know, you had all of the altcoin narratives, you had the NFT narrative. There was just a lot, you know, a lot of. A lot of interesting possibility about what, what this could be used for. And I, And I don't, I don't. I think it's revisionist history to. To say otherwise, you know, so. And also, like, for me, talking to Pascal, who I'd made some friends here in Paris, one of them was Pascal Gauthier, first investor in Ledger. Other one was Tony Fidel, who's, you know, you know, inventor of the ipod, co inventor of the iPhone, creator of Nest. And we were talking about, like, what could this be be, you know, and, and. And the interesting thing is that now I'm having, like, a bit of a deja vu moment relative to, you know, when we were. When we thought we were building interesting things on the Internet, but we were only building them for Windows PCs. And then 10 years later, and there's a proliferation of iPhones, you're like, oh, this is why we built it. Remembering a very similar thing now where it's like, yeah, we built the best digital security platform, and the first application of that was crypto. And now we are entering, you know, again, what Marc Andreessen calls a computer security Apocalyp. And, you know, there is for sure a use case for this technology in. In this agentic world. And the interesting thing to come back to your original question about ideology is many of the decisions that we made have turned out to be very valuable in the AI world, where the fact that every time you connect a ledger, it phones home to an HSM which checks? Is this the firmware I'm expecting? Is this the chip I'm expecting that gives you proof of human? Human. It's the basis for our technology for, for proof of human. You know, the fact that you have a secure screen and we've never compromised on the secure screen allows you to approve a complex transaction that an agent is signing. Which is something that like a Yubikey couldn't do for kind of getting to pick all this fruit. Yeah, exactly. You know, you've, you've made, you've made decisions for ideological reasons in the past. They're paying off, but it turns out that they pay dividends today and that, that's like cool. Quite encouraging. Yeah. You know, to be honest, you've been at Ledger, I think for six years, five and a half. You've spent a lot of your career in these sort of cycles that equate to roughly five years. Ledger's come a long way. This other stuff is starting to work. One could have taken the view that now would be the time for the next thing. You've instead taking on a new role at Ledger. Well, I would argue that is the next thing. Right. I mean, so you know, when I was at, when I was at Yahoo, there was a moment where I was like, okay, I'm going to do something else. That thing I do might be at Yahoo. And I looked at that and I also looked at things outside and I left. It was similar at lvmh. You know, it was possible that my next job at LVMH was at lvmh. When I started at lvmh, I told them, I said, you know, I think this is a 10 year job and you should have me do it for five. Because, you know, after five you've heard all my jokes, you know, like I, I think that's normal. Like you've added to it what you're going to add to it. Your journey with the company. Your point is exactly? Yeah, I think that it's great to have, you know, if, if somebody's been in a role for five years, you probably really have gotten out of them what they're going to bring to that role. And, and so now it's actually great to have someone else come in because they're going to bring something different, different, you know, so. And if you get somebody really complimentary, you get somebody even better. You know that I think it's a really good thing for a company. I think similarly for me here I came in to look after the consumer business. We've Grown a lot over that time. We've gone from, you know, kind of these devices that look like USB sticks to these really nice touchscreen devices that are much easier to use. Actually, like, we've, we've achieved the goal of like, ease of use with, you know, with a secondary security device. And we've gone from a business that was kind of 0% services to 50% services. So buy, sell, swap, stake, lend, credit card, all of these services that you put on top of it. So we, we really accomplished something over that time. And then it's, it probably is good for the company to have, you know, somebody who wants to come prove they can do it better than me come in and that, that's a great thing. That's, that's the way it works it at lvmh as an example, right? If you're, if you're not performing as a CEO, they will bring in a new CEO. And you know, what that CEO wants to do is to prove they can do it better than you. And that's great dynamic for the company, for the shareholders. It's not a personal thing. It's like, that's the dynamic that works for the shareholders. And for me, look, I, I, I've been delivered this incredible gift in my life, right? I'm an old command line nerd. Like, I'm ambidextrous. I know VI and Emacs key bindings and that's just where I, I'm an old sysadmin. That's where I come from. And you know, like I started, you know, I had a, I used to have an Rs6000 under my desk and a Next on my desk. And I lived at the command line. So last summer, you know, when, when I started using, you know, Claude code, if you'd have asked me like, is this the next big thing? I'd have said, no, no, no way. It's great for me because I'm that guy. I love, I love this interface. I love like typing at the command line and watching it think like, this is just perfect for me, for the normal person. No way. So I'm completely surprised that I, I was, nobody was as surprised as me. As for sort of like Claude Code Winter, you know, you know, everybody that went away
Ian Rogers 1:43:23 ↗
For Christmas break and came back, you know, Claude Code converts and you know, but what a huge gift. And so there was a point at the beginning of this year where Pascal, who's my good friend and the CEO of Ledger, he said, look, you know, we really need to triple down and figure out, like, how we can secure this environment. And I said, well, I'm really glad to hear you say that, because this is what I've been doing instead of my day job for the last six months, because I'm just obsessed with this technology. So there was just kind of like perfect fit there for us.
You know, my title before was Chief Experience Officer, which was a bit of a controversial title because people are like, what does that actually mean? And what it meant was, you know, the experience in crypto is pretty bad. You know, when you buy an iPhone, you're not buying a piece of hardware, you're buying an experience. You're buying blue bubbles instead of green bubbles. What's our version of that? How can we improve the experience in crypto? My title now is Chief Human Agency Officer, which, you know, chief AI Officer. You might as well be called Chief Job killer. Right. But we realize that our role is actually something different, that agents can only suggest. And every action needs to be approved either by a policy which has been set by a human or by a human. Those are the only options. Every action that an agent takes must be approved. This is not happening currently.
I think it should. Don't. At least my sense is that the classic just spam approve on Claude.
Ian Rogers 1:45:01 ↗
Yeah, well, and, you know, I think that this is, you know, at the same time there is an attempt at policies which are baked into the system. Right now we have guardrails and we're trusting that, you know, which we know can be jailbroken, but like that, you know, so there's an attempt at that. But I just think that's the wrong division of labor. Right. You know, you should put a boundary with the wrong supervisor outside of that. Exactly. And you know, you can. A much better outcome is that you have an LLM can be what it is and it can do what it's good at, which is reasoning and suggesting. And then when it's time to take an action, that action is checked by a deterministic player in the mix, which is either a policy which has been set by a human or a human. Those are the only two options. And that's why, you know, we talk about human in the loop, but I take that very seriously. Human in the loop. The challenge is, I think we're currently... I don't know when this will come out. We are hitting the limits on like LLM as a kind of like, do this thing for me and we're going to like, go off and do stuff and I'll check back in.

41 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Rogers, I. (2026, August 10). From Slayer T-Shirts to Louis Vuitton: Ian Rogers on Selling Culture [Interview transcript]. Dialectic Podcast with Jackson Dahl. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1181312/

MLA

Ian Rogers. "From Slayer T-Shirts to Louis Vuitton: Ian Rogers on Selling Culture." Dialectic Podcast with Jackson Dahl, 10 Aug. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1181312/.

BibTeX
@misc{rogers2026_1181312,
  author       = {Ian Rogers},
  title        = {From Slayer T-Shirts to Louis Vuitton: Ian Rogers on Selling Culture},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Dialectic Podcast with Jackson Dahl. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {aug},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1181312/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}