CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Anthony Pompliano
Founder & CEO, Professional Capital Management

Anthony Pompliano: Why Bitcoin will DOMINATE the AI bull market!

📅 May 15, 2026 Phil Rosen and Anthony Pompliano 20 MIN 4825 VIEWS 23 SEGMENTS · 2 SPEAKERS
Anthony Pompliano is the CEO of ProCap Financial. He joins Phil Rosen on Full Signal to discuss the economic data behind the Iran conflict, how bitcoin fits into the current macro story, and why the "AI bubble" crowd is dead wrong. This episode is sponsored by Public: https://public.com/openingbell Subscribe to Opening Bell Daily: https://www.openingbelldailynews.com/... Follow Phil on X: https://x.com/philrosenn Follow Phil on LinkedIn:   / philrosen   Timestamps: 0:00 - Affordability decides midterms 3:00 - Iran war driving inflation 4:33 - Short conflict vs. structural inflation 7:08 -...

What Anthony Pompliano said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Pompliano argued that cost of living, not geopolitics, drives voters, and that Republicans face a midterm risk if affordability does not improve, noting that 40% of the recent CPI jump came from gas prices. He said the Iran conflict must end within two to three weeks to avoid structural inflation, and that the administration cannot unwind energy issues with an executive order. He framed Bitcoin as a certainty asset in uncertain times, citing its digital scarcity and auditability. He predicted the AI boom will be larger and longer than expected, citing Anthropic's 80x growth versus planned 10x, and argued that supply shortages in power, data centers, and chips will push prices higher. He dismissed AI bubble claims, saying bears misunderstand exponential demand, and endorsed buying at all-time highs, quoting George Soros and Paul Tudor Jones.

Key takeaways

  1. Pompliano said if the Iran conflict does not end in two to three weeks, he will shift to expecting structural inflation.
  2. He cited Anthropic's 80x growth versus a planned 10x as evidence of insatiable AI demand.
  3. He said 40% of the recent CPI jump came from gas prices, tying it to the Iran war.
  4. He argued Bitcoin is a certainty asset for 20-year holding due to digital scarcity and auditability.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
40% Share of CPI jump from gas prices metric 3:00
80x Anthropic's actual growth versus planned 10x metric 9:45
20 years Holding period for Bitcoin as certainty asset timeline 7:12
3x Anthropic's planned growth baseline metric 9:45

Chapters

  1. 0:00Cost of living and voter behavior
  2. 1:21Affordability and Republican midterm risk
  3. 3:00Iran conflict and inflation impact
  4. 7:12Bitcoin as certainty asset
  5. 9:45AI demand and supply shortages
  6. 13:52Dismissing AI bubble claims
  7. 19:34Momentum and market intelligence

Questions asked in this interview

4
  1. 0:00Okay, Pomp, we had two hot inflation reports this week and you have been writing a lot about how affordability and cost of living will be the biggest thing for the political side of the economy. What's going on here?
  2. 7:08But I have to ask you, how does Bitcoin fit into this whole picture here?
  3. 9:24So my question now, do you think the thesis changes at all with the acceleration of technology and maybe all the spend going into AI from the hyperscalers here?
  4. 12:27What do you say to that?
Host 0:00 ↗
Okay, Pomp, we had two hot inflation reports this week and you have been writing a lot about how affordability and cost of living will be the biggest thing for the political side of the economy. What's going on here?
Anthony Pompliano 0:10 ↗
Well, I think that cost of living is what people actually care about. They don't care what's going on in Iran. They don't care what's going on in the geopolitical conflict between China and the United States when it comes to technology. How does that put food on my table? How does that make sure I got more money in my bank account? How does that make sure that I feel like I can do the things I want to do on a day-to-day basis? Right? It's all about the lived experience. And while plenty of people in Silicon Valley or in Wall Street, you know, we talk about all of these, you know, kind of much bigger ideas, these longer term trends, the data, the competition, geopolitics, these like intellectually stimulating ideas, at the end of the day, if you're living anywhere in this country, whether it's on the coast, in the middle of the country, if you're living in the south, anywhere, all you care about is can I put gas in my truck to go to work? Can I feed my kids? Can I take my wife out on the weekend to go on a nice little date? If I see something on the internet that I want, can I buy it? And do I feel like I got enough money in my bank account that I'm going to be all right? If you could do that for people, they're very interested in your policies. But if they feel like they can't have that life or have that security or have those opportunities, then they want change.
And I think that affordability right now is a huge debate. And unfortunately, a big part of the country is turning towards socialism because they're basically saying this system doesn't work for me in terms of capitalism. And so I think right now the Republicans have a very specific mandate. Affordability is getting worse. You're going to get your clock cleaned in November unless you get affordability in a better spot. And the hard part about affordability in a short period of time is the data might get better, but the psychology doesn't. And so you saw this with Biden, even after inflation had turned over and come down a little bit, people are still, yo, this stuff is expensive. I don't care what your data is telling me, what you nerds are doing with your calculators, right? All I know is I go to the grocery store and I buy not a lot of food and it's 100 bucks. That used to not happen. It's just psychologically people are just saying it's too expensive. And they don't care about the inflation rate. They just care about what is the nominal price I'm paying. And I think that that is a huge problem here going into the second half of the year. And so we got to get inflation to subside and we got to get affordability in a better spot for every single American. So I think one disconnect here too is that President Trump, whatever he may be doing on the affordability side, he is talking about the stock market and crypto prices and saying, hey, it's time to buy assets. And for a very small slice of the population, that's a great indicator and you want to be long assets when President Trump's in office. But the fact of the matter is the midterm elections will not go his way if he cannot probably get some rhetoric into the airwaves here about affordability, cost of living, things like that.
Well, I would say it's not even so much him talking about the affordability. Like we live in a country now where most people, myself included, when the politicians start talking on either side of the aisle, immediately you're skeptical. You just listen. Show me, right? And look, I think that if you look at the Trump administration and their current progress, if we go back to end of last year, economic boom, prices were starting to turn over. Inflation was coming down. The deflationary forces of deportations, tariffs, AI, and robotics were swallowing the US economy. It was high growth, low inflation environment. That is like a central banker or politician's dream. Now with the war in Iran, you go right at the heart of energy prices. Oil spikes, energy's up, gas at the pump is up, all this stuff. Well, 40% of the jump in CPI came from gas prices. So you look at that and you say to yourself, okay, without Iran happening, it was a free walk. They were going to dominate the rest of Trump's time in office.
Now we're talking about what, in three months, literally the 100 days, we went from that environment of high growth, low inflation to oh whoa, hold on a second, CPI spiking, PPI spiking, etc. Now what I've said since the day that this war started, if it is short-lived, inflation is not going to be a problem because the deflationary structure is going to overwhelm it. But if we have a prolonged conflict, then the analysis changes. I think that right now we're kind of at the turning point. This is about as long as the conflict can go on without this being a much more structural inflation type issue. So if this thing doesn't end in the next two to three weeks, you're going to see me go from, hey, I think this is going to be short-lived and I think that inflation is not going to be a problem, to oh boy, here we go. We saw the story before. Inflation's going to spike, right? And I think that is what the American people are looking at, because whatever happens in the next three weeks, that's ultimately going to determine November.
Host 5:10 ↗
And I think if we prolong this longer than we need to or should, these inflation reports are going to piss a lot of people off. Even if they are .1% higher than expectations, it almost doesn't matter what the actual numbers will be. It's just if it's moving directionally how people want or don't want.
Anthony Pompliano 5:28 ↗
Well, but you know what's funny is I don't care about is it higher or lower than expectations, right? The reason, if you notice, I almost rarely tweet about the expectations because just because everyone is bad at actually guessing what inflation is shouldn't be an anchoring point, right? Instead, it should just be what's the number? Is it going up? Is it going down? How much is it going up? How much is it going down? That's to me 90% of the story. The fact that you got a bunch of economists who are bad at guessing the number, well, that's the economists' problem. That has no say whatsoever over the American people's life, right, is that somebody else is good or bad at their job. Now, I hope that they're accurate, right? That'd be great. It would give us more information earlier, all this stuff. Historically, they're just not that accurate. So, put that aside. The bigger problem is, no, dude, this stuff is jumping higher in the short term. There are these short-term energy price things. And so, I think that the administration, Trump's been talking about publicly. He believes that if he ends the war in Iran, the price of oil is going to come down, energy will subside, and everything will be gravy, maybe, right? I don't know. That would be the hope, right? I don't care what side of the political aisle that you personally subscribe to or if you're an independent, you want energy prices lower. That is good for America, that is good for business, that is good for people. Let's see what happens though, right? So I think the difference here between what Trump's done with Iran compared to let's say Liberation Day, he can't exactly unwind all of this with a stroke of a pen. It's not an executive order thing where suddenly the Strait of Hormuz is all resolved and oil starts flowing and all the refiners get back online. So that's one big difference that I'm personally watching for energy prices.
Host 7:08 ↗
But I have to ask you, how does Bitcoin fit into this whole picture here?
Anthony Pompliano 7:12 ↗
Bitcoin is an asset that gives you certainty in times of uncertainty. And I think that that is a lost value proposition of Bitcoin. What do I mean by that? Right now, what's the cost of capital going to be just in Q3? Forget two years from now, nobody has any clue. At the Fed, there is so much dissent that some people think we should hike rates, some people think we should lower rates, some people think that we should keep them equal. So, nobody knows. Okay, that's uncertainty. Is the AI boom sustainable or not? I think so. There's a lot of people who think not so, right? Okay, that's uncertainty. Is the stock market going higher or is a big crash ahead because the PE ratio is at some level, blah blah, whatever. I don't know. That's uncertainty. Are American citizens stronger than they've ever been or are they actually in pain? Are we in a rolling recession or are we just living life on credit? You can twist this data to tell all kinds of stories, uncertainty. And so, what do I want in my portfolio? I want to buy an asset and I want to hold it for the next 20 years. If you tell me right now I got to buy one asset and hold it for 20 years, the asset that has the most certainty to me is a digitally scarce, a finite-based asset that I can audit at any time, that is resilient, that is non-sovereign, and has got the hearts and minds of an entire generation that is going to continue to make money and going to inherit the boomer generation's capital. So, I like Bitcoin because it is simple, it is resilient, and it is certain. When you put those three things together, there's not a lot of things that fit that. Now, go look at how did people make money before. They did pretty much the same thing. They bought indexes, they bought real estate, right? That's how families made money. And so, I just think that Bitcoin has now stepped into this bucket of assets that you can buy and hold for a really long period of time. It's just that at certain times, it draws down. Bitcoin's over. Like, sure. They said that how many times before? Let's see.
Host 9:24 ↗
I mean, the fact that it's even at what, 82,000 right now or 81,000, it's pretty unbelievable. So my question now, do you think the thesis changes at all with the acceleration of technology and maybe all the spend going into AI from the hyperscalers here?
Anthony Pompliano 9:45 ↗
Well, I think that there's a couple things going on. One, I'm a big believer that the AI boom is going to be much bigger and much more prolonged than most people think. That's first of all. The second of all is if you went to your economics 101 class for the first day, you didn't have to go after that, but if you went for the first day, they talked all about supply and demand. And in the supply and demand conversation, there is a ton of demand, insatiable demand. Dario Amodei over at Anthropic talked about they planned in their business to like 3x and then the outlandish example was okay let's be prepared for 10x growth and they 80x'd, right? So that is incredible demand. So where is supply lacking? Well, you can start going through, there's power generation, there's data centers, there's chips, there's chemicals, there's commodities, there's all of these things that end up being a huge problem. Well, all of those problems or shortages are likely to lead to higher prices over the long run. So if you are an investor, Bitcoin scarcity, go through every single thing I just talked about with the AI trade, scarcity, right? That is what people ultimately want. That's why you see the memory stocks doing so well. It's like scarcity.
And so to me, that is a very simple way to invest, is find things where demand outstrips supply and it is going to be a structural shortage in the coming years. And therefore if you buy the asset now and the shortage persists, prices will be higher because price is the market clearing kind of mechanism to actually get these things to trade hands. Now with that said, how does Bitcoin fit in? In a world of abundance, scarcity becomes really valuable. And so if I can now create music with a couple of clicks, nobody wants to hear me sing. But if I can create an AI song that goes to number one on the Billboard, well, what becomes valuable in music? It's probably things that are super rare, like, I don't know, maybe in-person concerts. It's hard to replicate for AI. It's unique. It's very small number of them. It's infrequent. It takes effort from a human, all these components. Okay. Well, go now to stores of value. Bitcoin is scarce. It also requires effort in terms of the mining process and the expenditure of energy and all these things. So I just think that all of these technologies are colliding and there's one big trade. They're never going to stop printing money and technology is going to be bigger and much more in demand than everyone realizes. And if you believe those two things, which I do, get long and chill. Just chill. They are going to make your investment portfolio explode in value over the next decade. So, just chill.

9 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Pompliano, A. (2026, May 15). Anthony Pompliano: Why Bitcoin will DOMINATE the AI bull market! [Interview transcript]. Phil Rosen and Anthony Pompliano. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1204854/

MLA

Anthony Pompliano. "Anthony Pompliano: Why Bitcoin will DOMINATE the AI bull market!." Phil Rosen and Anthony Pompliano, 15 May. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1204854/.

BibTeX
@misc{pompliano2026_1204854,
  author       = {Anthony Pompliano},
  title        = {Anthony Pompliano: Why Bitcoin will DOMINATE the AI bull market!},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Phil Rosen and Anthony Pompliano. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {may},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/1204854/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}