CEOInterviews.AI
Start App
Parker Harris
Co-Founder, Chief Technology Officer of Slack & Director, Salesforce Inc

Live Q&A with Product Leaders | True to the Core, Dreamforce 2026

📅 Sep 18, 2026 Salesforce 60 MIN 3174 VIEWS 111 SEGMENTS · 22 SPEAKERS
Join Salesforce Co-founder Parker Harris and Salesforce product leaders for a fan-favorite, unscripted Dreamforce session focused on the questions customers and developers care about most. Hear candid answers on feature requests, product feedback, platform priorities, and potential roadmap changes as Salesforce leaders discuss what’s next for the platform and the future of the Agentic Enterprise. Learn more about Agentforce: https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce/ Check out our guide to the Agentic Enterprise: https://www.salesforce.com/agentforce... This video comes to you from Dreamforce 20...

What Parker Harris said

Written from the verified transcript and checked against it. Every figure links to the moment it was said.

Parker Harris, Co-Founder and CTO of Slack, fielded community feedback at Dreamforce 2026. He committed to sending more product teams to community events, after asking Rohan and Patrick to agree on stage. He addressed the stagnant IdeaExchange, promising to process all 10+ year old ideas by TDX, using AI to close or roadmap them. He acknowledged product renaming frustrations, explaining names are often 'moments in time' that cause inconsistent updates, and he wants to codify that. He apologized for a flex credit outage, admitting they lacked caps, and said they actioned an investigation that afternoon. He praised a suggestion to add importance ratings to IdeaExchange, and committed to improving support case governance for enterprises in 12-18 months. He also noted ongoing work on AI for known issues and accessibility regressions.

Key takeaways

  1. Commitment to process all 10+ year old IdeaExchange ideas by TDX, closing or roadmapping them.
  2. Flex credit caps are being investigated after a $30,000 rogue process incident.
  3. Support case governance improvements are expected in the next 12-18 months.

Numbers and commitments

FigureWhat it refers toTypeAt
4 million Flex credits burned in two days by a rogue process metric 41:11
$30,000 Cost of the rogue process event price 41:11
12 to 18 months Timeline for support case governance improvements timeline 46:12
10+ year Age of IdeaExchange ideas to be processed by TDX timeline 14:29

Chapters

  1. 0:00Opening and community stats
  2. 5:02IdeaExchange and community commitment
  3. 7:15OEM ISV platform events request
  4. 9:52Trailhead localization gap
  5. 11:59Community engagement commitment
  6. 13:15IdeaExchange backlog AI cleanup
  7. 17:02Experience Cloud dynamic forms frustration
  8. 18:49Flex credit sandbox testing issue
  9. 20:57Security change rollout communication
  10. 23:24Dashboard color customization feedback

Questions asked in this interview

12
  1. 6:01We would love some volunteers. Anyone want to volunteer?
  2. 7:15Can you extend that ability for the OEM ISV also?
  3. 11:59What you got? Oh, what do I got?
  4. 26:06And then on the known issues, does someone want to take that?
  5. 31:16What customer problem is being solved by the frequency of these renames and how are you measuring whether the benefit outweighs the confusion?
  6. 37:38Would you mind connecting just after we're done here and just have a quick discussion on this get into more detail?
  7. 42:29How is Salesforce planning to make products completely headless for the deaf community and where individuals can interact with AI in their native sign languages?
  8. 47:07But it is not a good experience to have to leave what you're doing to just @mention somebody, right?
  9. 51:25And behind the scenes, we have edge protections to make sure that bots are not taking over and there's no attacks that are compromising your email. Does that address your concern?
  10. 54:29Yeah, because would you like to give us more money?
  11. 56:53If we are 10 times more costly, they're going to say, why don't you use that?
  12. 58:21Can we get an MCP for Salesforce help docs so like Claude can actually access all the help docs?
Parker Harris 0:06 ↗
All right, welcome everyone. Hopefully, if you're not here for True to the Core, please leave. Just kidding. So, this is always our favorite way or my favorite way to close out the conference. Somehow the faces keep changing, but mine still stays up here. But I love doing it. I love being with the community. I saw a small cohort of you at the what do we call the trailblazer Patrick? What do we call it? At the beginning, the party, the MVP, the unconference. Thank you. The unconference. So, that was awesome. If you want to see some crazy people dancing, that was one way to do it. But we gave out some awards and so saw a few of you. But here we want to just hear from you and have an exchange, kind of bond with you over ideas of how to make the product better. And so I love your feedback and then I just hand it off to everyone else to go handle it. And with that I will pass it off. Meredith, are you going next or who's going?
Meredith 1:04 ↗
Yeah, why don't you hit it? Well, first of all, I want to say thank you to Joy for being here with us again. Welcome Joy once again. Thank you. I had the iPad for a moment to answer the questions and I was told to dutifully hand it over. Yeah. I mean, I think what we love about True to the Core is the feedback. It turns into real programs. For example, like coming out of True to the Core, we rebuilt the well-architected program. We had an amazing admin keynote, architect keynote yesterday. We rebuilt the well-architected program. We did that in partnership with many of the architects here in the room that came directly from True to the Core. So, there's a lot of feedback that we get that we take, we bring it into programs. And twice a year, we're also doing a community sentiment survey. So, we get a lot of feedback here one-on-one. You all line up in the mics. We love that feedback, but we also have thousands of you that give us feedback twice a year and you've told us about pricing there. We'll probably hear more about that today. You told us about some of the frustrations with the product name changings and how fast everything is moving and we look through all of those comments. A lot of that is turning into programs that we're running. And I wanted to share one stat that came from our community sentiment survey that we did just recently in August. And it was around the skills and the skills that many of you said you needed in order to be successful in your career. And 60% of you said that the most important skill is around your AI skills. And so I wanted to share real quick before we get into the questions some of the programs that we've put into place. So a lot of you are on Trailhead. We've had over 151 million badges that have been completed on Trailhead, which is that's a lot of learning. So, congratulations to all of our learners in the room. You know, at this point, we have 1.5 million active certifications in the ecosystem. So, that is turning into real certifications and 270,000 Ranger statuses. So, an incredible amount of learning happening in this room and across the ecosystem. By the end of the year, we will have done 700,000 instructor-led learning. So, training that many of you are showing up, you're learning, you're getting hands-on, and it's always incredible to see what's happening across our online groups. So, we have 8,000 community groups where many of our community members are answering questions, helping you get up to speed on all of this incredible innovation and change that you're seeing. But I wanted to make sure that you were also aware that we have virtual workshops. By the end of the year, we'll have a hundred of those happening around twice a week. You can go, you can get hands-on and by the end of this year we will have trained up 1.3 million trailblazers. So if you don't know what I'm talking about you can go to developer.salesforce.com. You can find out about these virtual workshops. Hopefully you went over to the trailblazer forest this week. It was packed. The lines were long. So, there's just an incredible amount of opportunities for you to get hands-on with the technology. But a lot of that learning also happens in the community. And so, we have, you know, three and a half thousand community group meetings that are happening every year. And we're taking all of that enablement that we do virtually and we're giving it to our community group leaders so you can bring it to your user groups. So really excited to get that in the hands of all of you this year. 50 community conferences that are happening around 20 countries. We have Salesforce leaders that are showing up. We had over 120 that came this year, including my friend here, Jay Hurst, who joined us at Midwest Dreaming this year. So you can expect to see more of our product leaders and our executives showing up at this community. So, with that, I'll turn things over to Jay, I believe, to talk about the idea exchange.
Jay Hurst 5:02 ↗
Yeah, and thank you guys for joining us again. You know, this is always one of the most enjoyable parts of Dreamforce to really hear the unadulterated feedback from everybody. So, we continue to appreciate that. But we have been continuing to deliver what we can. Over 445 ideas were delivered in the last 18 months. Ideas that you guys have pushed us to and driven us to deliver for you. So, wonderful changes like launching the screen flows from related lists and list views. That was a huge one. I know a lot of you have been asking for that for a number of years. One that I'm really happy for, Daniel Ballinger working on the Apex heap limits, really increasing that, really easing some of that simple developer pain that you guys are seeing. So, and plus the over 1,000 ideas that our PMs have been commenting and engaging with you on to get workarounds, feedback, and continue to drive it. So, thank you for your support and your feedback.
Meredith 6:01 ↗
And I believe I'm turning over. Yeah, you're turning over to me. I also want to remind everybody that you don't have to wait for just two times a year to give us your feedback. There are multiple ways to give us feedback throughout the year. You can visit idea exchange. You can attend the next True to the Core deep dive. We run webinars all year long and you can also participate in our Salesforce research program. The QR code is up now. We would definitely love for you to do that. The closer we can get to you throughout the year and get your feedback, the better. All right, with that. All right. So I was kind of expecting mics here, Emily, but I will do this. It's fine. Don't worry. I'm all good. I'm all good. I'll keep an eye on this one. And so, you know, they walk funny out of here. Don't worry about it. So, please line up. We would love some volunteers. Anyone want to volunteer? Ready, set, go. Ask a question. All right. So, if you get in line, we will do our best to get through as many of you as possible. And since this line organized earlier, you guys get to go first.
Siokumar 7:15 ↗
Yeah. My name is Siokumar. I am from PTC ServiceMax. I'm here to say a thanks and also ask a question. The thanks is a couple of years back in the same True to the Core I raised an issue about a platform event and I worked with the product team and then it got resolved but as an extension of it, as an extension of it there was a question about how the individual customers or the ISV can look at what's going on in the platform events rather than reaching out to Salesforce support team. So what happened was the scale center team we started working with the scale center team and in the last couple of years we there were lot of development that was made I want to say thanks to the team because they have developed the platform events related changes into scale center it's really amazing I don't need to go to the support team I don't need to ask about which particular event is creating a problem now I have the ability to look into the platform events and get the details so I wanted to say thanks to the entire skills product team. The ask is it's right now available only for the individual customers as an ISV. Can you extend that ability for the OEM ISV also?
Parker Harris 8:43 ↗
Do we have Roger? Sounds like a good idea to me. Wow, we got some shy people. Oh, we got Yeah. Anyone want to jump in here? Come on, don't be shy. Connect with your customers in a whole new way. Let's go.
Roger 8:59 ↗
First of all, thank you for the shout out. It means a lot to us and Chris is right here. So, it's a partnership between Scale Center and platform events team. If we can get more requirements from you because there is one thing about getting your package itself observability around that and then we've also heard you getting insights into your customers who've installed your package and observability around that. So which one out of the two would you say is top priority?
Siokumar 9:36 ↗
I would say the one about the managed package that would be the highest priority.
Roger 9:41 ↗
Okay, we can connect offline to define those requirements. Thank you. Great. Thank you for the question.
Parker Harris 9:47 ↗
Okay, over here. Hi. Oh, this is Katie. Hello Katie. Oh, it's on. Awesome. Yeah, cool. Bring it.
Katie Vanoeva 9:52 ↗
My name is Katie Vanoeva. I am a first-time caller, longtime listener, and my question is for Meredith. You had a slide with all these countries flags and then you just you know very much owned how awesome the trailblazers are around the world and how many certifications we hold. However, but I have it written on my hand because I'm a professional. The Trailhead localized titles Excel sheet, there's a badge for how to get Trailhead in your language. Of the 1,922 badges in English, only 583 of them, which equals about 30% are in at least Spanish. I didn't account for any of the other languages. I'm from the Latino community, so I want to represent. But how do we support the individuals that are carrying your product forward in other countries and helping them get all those certifications that you put on there? I did come from the Latino meetup earlier and there was a common thread and discussion that it is hard to learn Salesforce in native languages with technology going so fast. How is Trailhead planning to keep up with this? Yeah, if we are only at 30% right now.
Meredith 11:13 ↗
Yeah. Well, I love that you did your homework. Thank you. I can go back to my team with that stat. So, I appreciate that. We did launch the MCP server for Trailhead. And so, we've been working really closely with our localization teams because we can do a lot with technology to localize the content, but we need to make it sure it really works for those local markets. So, I think we can certainly increase that coverage. And please come find me at TDX because I want that 30% to be a lot higher. I think you're right, we have the technology to do that and I think we can absolutely increase that number beyond 30. So, thank you for the feedback and thank you for the certifications in Spanish this year. Props to you. Thanks, Katie.
Audience Member 11:59 ↗
Hi, Michelle. Hi, Joy. Hi, gang. What you got? Oh, what do I got? Well, I got three things, but I'll be quick. Number one, I want to say thank you. You have expanded the community space at Dreamforce this year. It is clear that you are listening in some ways at least. And I realize there's other things that it's going to take longer to see the results from the request that we make. So, my request is actually doubling down on one I made here a year, year and a half ago. And I had asked to put on the V2MOM that every Salesforce employee needed to attend even virtually a community user group meeting or community conference. And this year, as Meredith mentioned, Jay, Meredith, several others actually attended Midwest Dreaming. And the feedback we got from that was huge. And the feedback we got from the PMs who attended was also huge that it was beneficial to them as well. So I am asking for your commitment to send more of your product teams to these community user groups to the community conferences and give us another opportunity to interact with you for those who cannot make it to these events.
Parker Harris 13:15 ↗
I will ask my product leaders here, Rohan and Patrick, will you make a commitment to send your teams out to community?
Rohan 13:25 ↗
Yes.
Parker Harris 13:26 ↗
Yay. All right. Thank you. See, I manage up well. Can't wait to see everybody. Can't wait to see everybody. Parker. Oh, yes. There's been an insistent question coming in on the iPad. Oh, okay. Okay. Yeah, it won't go away. No, it's not going to go away. We're going to have to address this now. Oh. Oh, joy. Rude. That's rude. You use my name on me like that. I did. I did. Ouch. When are you returning to Salesforce? Stop. This is crazy. That's not fair. No, this I can't read it like that. I never left Salesforce. No. No. I don't know who thinks I left Salesforce. No. So, I think the question is yes. When are you going to Slack is part of Salesforce in case you're seriously? Does everyone know that Slack is owned by Salesforce? It's all the same company. We're one company. There is a concern that the idea exchange is stagnant and they want you to kick it in the tail and get it moving again. Yeah. And I think you have an answer to that. Maybe. I think Patrick and Rohan have an answer to that.
Patrick 14:29 ↗
I think we do have an answer to that. I think we do something about it. Yes, we have some stuff aging, right? Anyone, is it 20 years that we have ideas out there? Anyone? Yes. Yes. 10 years. 20 years. 20 years. What's the number out there that you guys are all owning? Anyone? Long time, right? They're not willing to raise their hand and say their idea is 20 years old. I've been on the platform for 23 years. So there are ideas out there that are 20 years old. Yeah. And I definitely know that we have ones that are there for at least 10 years. Yeah. And we are going to do something about it. Why don't we take a look? Rebecca, I think we can do something about this. Let's have Claude help us. We're gonna have Claude close all of them right now. Come on. Let's look at all of the ones that are 10 years. All right, we have a couple here. Looks like we have delivered a lot, but it also looks like we have a lot that are still open. Open is winning. Yeah. And it looks like that a bunch that are 10 years plus have had 43% of you upvote them in the last year, which means you still want them. Okay, so let's take a look. Let's see if we can organize these. Yeah, organize them by PM. Love that. That one. Let's do this. All right. And now I think we can group them and send them off to the product teams. I think we can go through all of these. Okay. So here's what we're going to do. We're going to look at this backlog. We're going to go through the 10 plus year ones that we have and we're going to process all of them and we're going to either close them out and tell you exactly why we're closing them out or we're going to put them on the roadmap in the next year. That's bold. Come on. That was like an applause. Thank you. That's amazing. Oh jeez. And because you know we're going back in time, we're not going to stop there. We're going to keep going. And this will just be the beginning. We're going to burn them all down. But by TDX, we'll have the 10 plus year ones. Okay. Everyone hear that? TDX. Yep. Is that six? Is that six here at TDX or online at TDX? Yeah. All right. Thank you for the question, please.
Tom Basset 17:02 ↗
Hi. So I'm Tom Basset, senior solutions architect from London, and I have a rhyme for you again. I've done a couple of these in the past, so let's see how this one goes. Dynamic forms, actions, related lists, one family, one plan. Experience Cloud slammed the door before the trio began. This should be on core. No upsell, no additional license required. But since 2024, the promise hasn't quite transpired. Road Map Exchange says a fix is coming for LWR only though, so if your site runs on Aura, tough luck. No show. Headless 360 swears the UI is here to stay, but half your Dynamics family is still stuck in delay. So my ask here is plain and true. Roll it out everywhere. It's long overdue.
Parker Harris 17:59 ↗
Well, I'm sure we have eager to answer this one. Jay, would you like to answer that or assign someone to?
Jay Hurst 18:14 ↗
So experience cloud. Kush? We've got some shy PMs today. Kush, you can't get away by not being up here. We see we can see you.
Kush 18:28 ↗
Can you hear me? Yeah, there you go. Thanks again for your feedback. Again, we hear you. We understand the importance of dynamic forms. It's fundamentally been a prioritization issue and we'll take this back again to the drawing board and get back to you.
Parker Harris 18:42 ↗
Yeah. Okay. Thanks. Great. All right. Thanks, Tom.
Audience Member 18:49 ↗
Oh, dear again. Not going to put you in the hot seat today, Joy. I do want to second what I heard. I definitely think there's been a lot of great improvement and I recognize all the hard work Salesforce is doing with the community. So, thank you for that. My question quite simply boils down to it would be great if before Salesforce launches or changes an existing product if we can test it in a sandbox. I'll give a very short spiel, but we would have had an outage with Agentforce for five days in the migration from Agentforce employee license to the flex credit model just because sandboxes couldn't have the flex credit SKU and I learned way more than I care about with your deal team, your something tab team and a whole bunch of other teams at Salesforce pointing the finger at each other. So, if before y'all make a major change like that, which requires a signing event, if y'all could make sure we could actually test it, that would be awesome.
Parker Harris 19:55 ↗
Wow. I think I blame Steve Fischer on that. Thank you, Steve. It's only a matter of time. I'm happy to take that. So, first, apologies for what you went through with change on that. Overall, the commitment we can make is for large changes we want to try to do as many of those with the big releases as possible. At the same point I'm not going to promise you that everything we do will be on the major release as you've imagined with AI things move pretty darn fast. And so we have to balance how do we give that consistency reliability that you need for the production needs with the innovation. And so we want to make sure we separate those. So that the innovation lane is opt in and separate and we give the stability for the production ones.
Audience Member 20:46 ↗
But I don't think it was about the pace of change. It was that we broke them for pricing but the general let's go fast and not break things.
Parker Harris 20:57 ↗
I like that. Thanks Zach. All right. There you are. We have a question. You're in charge, Joy. I have the iPad. You got the cookie. I have no control here. All right. We've got a question from our online audience. I think Salesforce introduced a significant set of security changes. Jay, this is for you, by the way. Outside the normal three times a year release cycle with many of the requirements, timelines, and even details changing after the initial announcements, how is Salesforce going to improve the planning and communication of security rollouts so administrators have a stable, complete set of requirements and enough time to test and prepare before enforcement? Wow, that might have been the elephant in the room.
Jay Hurst 21:41 ↗
Thank you for the question. Yeah, the security changes with MFA, PRMFA, step up auth, that was it's been a challenging year, I'll say, for us. There's a lot of threat actors in the world who are increasingly targeting our customers. So, we had to move very fast in order to force these changes in. And it wasn't smooth. I'll admit that. Going forward as we continue to get more of these security controls in place, we are looking at a couple of different ways that we can implement this for you. So, you'll start to see these changes pop up into the release notes. We're going to carve out a new section specifically for security control changes where you'll be able to opt in pre-release. You'll be able to identify exactly when the rollout will hit your instance which was another challenge I know that we had is the scattershot way we were rolling it out. So we are improving this. The first wave was really about getting it out as fast as possible, getting our customers as secure as possible, and now we can get into the repeatable pattern to roll them out to you. So, thank you all for your patience with this, your partnership and the feedback on the community. To myself, to James and the identity team, we appreciate it and we are going to do better on this for you guys.
Parker Harris 23:04 ↗
My guess is this is only going to go faster. It will only go faster, but we want it to be repeatable. We want it to be predictable for you guys so that when something important does happen, you're able to easily opt in, opt out, and make the changes. So, great. Thank you. Okay.
Alain 23:24 ↗
Hey. Hi. My name's Alain. I've been here a few times. I want to start off with some kudos because it will take a turn after that and I know Andrew is coming up after me, too. I like that you are listening to us and like doing all those ideas you posted on the screen like a bunch of stuff that's been delivered. You're listening to us. You're like putting stuff in core and not only paying attention to AI all the time. So like I appreciate that, but I do take issue. I guess I'm going to tell a small story like not I'll avoid the story and just say like one of the things you put on the screen earlier very specifically affected my team. So, there's someone on my team, well, multiple stakeholders who just want to do something really simple. Just like have a chart and a dashboard that has the colors they want, like red, yellow, green. That sounds great. It also sounds relatively easy to put together. And right on the screen a few minutes ago, you said, someone asked for or people asked for more report and dashboard color customization and then it goes on with whatever and, you know, got cut off and you were like, we released all this awesome stuff, brand color palette and reporting. So, I want to ask the team genuinely, do you think that's a good solution to the problem you were trying to solve? Obviously, I think it's not at all useful and not at all what the people wanted, but you've marked it off as done now. And so, now I'm worried that you're never actually going to solve the problem that people wanted. And for the record, for the people listening, like all you can do is go into Salesforce settings and be like green, that's the color of my brand. And then Salesforce says, okay, you're going to have like five different greens and that's what your report can look like. But I just want to do something like red, yellow, green or make up my own colors or whatever. And the reason I bring this up is because it's so obviously what people want and the solution that you put in place that you advertise as having solved it is so obviously not what people wanted. So like how do you reconcile that and will you ever actually solve the problems you solve a lot of problems in the way people want. I don't want to take that away, but there are times when like you just do it wrong. And I want to know how like we deal with that and how you even put that together and said like that's a good solution.
PM Singer 25:35 ↗
Thanks for the feedback actually. So I just want to call out I'm the PM singer for the reports and dashboards and yes I definitely take your feedback but just the brand palettes which we have started that's the first phase of it and we are still working on getting to the exact problem you are looking at. So wait for some more time but we are definitely working on it.
Alain 25:55 ↗
Okay simple enough. Thank you.
Parker Harris 25:58 ↗
Thank you. Great. This is Andrew. Andrew. Andrew is ready. I know Andrew. Hello. Hi. Hello.
Andrew 26:06 ↗
Here. So, it's great that we have True to the Core and there's a lot of good questions that are asked, but there's also sometimes there's action taken on them. A lot of times there's commitments that are made and there's no follow-up or action taken on them. So, one the ask is that we can have some type of a blog post or some website, some place that Salesforce will one list out all the questions that were asked from each True to the Core and then the follow-up or action that came out of them to deliver them. So almost like an accountability ledger for True to the Core that would I think help a lot to help True to the Core. But we also have some issues that we need to go over specifically known issues. At the last True to the Core, there was a question that was asked about known issues. And if anyone remembers when the search was removed from the help site, that also broke the search from the known issues site because known issue search wasn't really needed. So it just broke and it only searched the title of the known issue, not the contents of it. That's kind of a problem. There also is a problem where currently of all of these known issues that are in solution in progress, solution scheduled or solution deploying, there are approximately 9,510. Thank you Claude for pulling that out because I had to scrape the website that have not been touched in 2026 but are currently getting the solution deployed or solution is deploying or solution is scheduled. I have a feeling that all solutions that are deploying will probably have happened within maybe six months of it and we're already in September. So there's like a thousand or 10,000 almost that are abandoned that are stale. It's a problem when builders are trying to figure out what's wrong and it's like well is it this bug? Do I need to talk to support? So it's quite a challenge and that's still open. I think MK maybe was on stage and agreed to look into it but we're still sitting at 10,000 currently. So just an example of one, but I think we need a ledger to really have accountability. Yeah. Well, I think on the ideas, I don't think we need new blogs and everything like most of these are ideas and so if the idea exists, we should have some way of tagging that it came up at the True to the Core and when so that you could see here's the ones that we've talked about. That would be my suggestion. We can do a blog as well, but I think if you have too many different places to look hard, I'm open to anywhere. The other one also, Trailhead phone support was offered at TDX. If you call 1-800-NO-SOFTWARE, I think it was offered that you could get Trailhead phone support if you had help with badges or super badges. I believe it was one of the questions that was an answer is that you could get phone support and I don't know that that exists yet. So, just another thing that was mentioned. Yeah. And then on the known issues, does someone want to take that? Got a shy group today. This is really interesting. Right. Some people some caffeine here. No. Great. That would be great if you don't mind. Thank you.
Parker Harris 29:05 ↗
Andrew, I'll stand right next to you.
Rebecca 29:07 ↗
So, for the known issues experience, we definitely hear you on the stale known issues. I will say the progress that we've made so far is that the sync functionality now does work moving forward. So we had in the past is product teams use a variety of coding systems when it comes to releases and if they're not on the core release schedule, they don't automatically sync. We have to do that manually and retroactively. The place where we're at now is that we have to go back in time and actually get the information from the individual engineering teams to know what to do with the status of that bulk of known issues he's talking about. So we need partnership. We lead the known issue side of the house, but from the engineering team, we have to know the source of truth before we can update them. So it's really the need of the engineer teams to go in and actually...
Parker Harris 29:55 ↗
Give us an accurate status.
Is that a question asking engineering? You know, something I was... they've committed to it. They're on, they're working through it. We know we've seen progress on that, but I think just to close the loop on why it occurs and how we handle it. There's always the solve moving us forward and then those retroactively how we address that data.
Yeah. One thing that we were talking just before we came up, I think we can do a lot more in looking at how to leverage AI for looking at known issues, for looking at things that haven't been solved to update and even close or hopefully eventually fix where the AI can maybe even start to suggest fixes. We can go a lot faster. I think we need to look at how we're managing this again and see if we can get some people just to try some things with AI to see how much faster we could go. So, we'll commit to that as well and maybe we'll make more progress. We'll give that a shot. And on your second question about Trailhead support through voice, it's available. You can try calling and if there are any issues, let me know. But, it's live.
Meredith 30:59 ↗
Oh, it is live. It is live. Yeah, I do. I have one, I have a question online question before we go to the next microphone. Patrick, are you ready?
Patrick 31:10 ↗
Well, I'm told you need to be ready.
Meredith 31:12 ↗
Are you stoked?
Patrick 31:12 ↗
Yes.
Salesforce has changed the names of so many products and capabilities that it is becoming difficult for customers to understand what they actually own and which documentation applies to them. What customer problem is being solved by the frequency of these renames and how are you measuring whether the benefit outweighs the confusion? Please and thank you. Personally, my certifications being renamed with the clouds and all of this makes my dozen... people complimented I said Sales Cloud, that is a great name, I love it.
Parker Harris 31:54 ↗
I appreciate all the laughter on the question. This drives us nuts, too. If we're being honest. I'll tell you what customer problem is being solved, and then I'll tell you what I think we can do about it. And you may not agree with the customer problem that's being solved. I'm just going to warn you. The way that we like to kind of talk about our products every year at these events is we like to put some sort of word either at the front or the back of it that implies what's new about it. It's all about making it seem like it is a new version. Now sane people would have like Sales Cloud version one, version two, version three. We're less sane than that. And so we come up with different names into it. And so that's what's actually going on behind the scenes is there is a process to imply what is new. Here's where it breaks. Where it breaks is that's really just a moment in time. And if we're all serious about it, we all recognize that at the end of the day, we just end up calling things the original names anyway in speech, right? We just say Sales Cloud. Whether it's Agent for Sales or Sales Cloud, we're going to say whatever. Most of the time we're going to say Sales Cloud. And so what happens is when these big changes come through or these new words come in, our teams, my teams overindex on it. They don't really appreciate that it's just a moment in time. It's just a way to communicate what's new. And instead, they go and they start trying to update the website and update this, and then they never get as far as they actually would need to to do a full-on web change. So then you see inconsistencies in things. And so the change that I want to make is to really codify that these name changes are just exactly that. They're a moment in time. They're meant to communicate what's new, but they're not actually real changes in the products where we're going to go and update the header and the website and all of these things. And that's going to be a little bit difficult to manage. But that's the change that I want to try to make. I fully appreciate how frustrating it is. I fully appreciate all the memes online that go on. I laugh at them too and then I cry a little bit. And so this is important and something that we're going to try to do better on.
Meredith 34:14 ↗
I love that answer.
All right. We have a question in front of us and I'm sorry I need to interrupt you before you start. Your dog is the cutest little doughnut right now and I'm loving it. Thank you. Too bad he knows it.
Andrew 34:33 ↗
My name is Andrew Johnson. I'm from BIT. And there's been a lot of talk this week about trapped value and Salesforce has uncaged a lot of trapped value over the years for blind people like me. The platform is so accessible that at one job no one knew I was blind in our cameras off organization for three months because I didn't need training. A nitty-gritty about Salesforce. And I love headless 360. I love having optionality, but I've also noticed that over the last year, one of the main reasons I'm logging into Salesforce less is because new rollouts or updates cause regressions that make it harder for me or sometimes impossible for me to do the work that I need to do. This is things like JD3, Flow Builder, Experience Builder. Now I'm pretty AI pilled. I love throwing tokens at problems to make my life easier. My friends say I love it too much. But I disagree. But that incurs an additional cost, specific knowledge and just this whole agentic loop of prompt, test and then sometimes like if it's visual like take a screenshot and send it to somebody else for something that sighted people can do with a couple of clicks. And I think about the guy who maybe isn't in a company like me or doesn't get to stand up here and is trying to compete in a sighted world. And I have to ask, is Salesforce still committed to making the UI a place where people like me can do real work?
Bonnie Paresi 36:32 ↗
I would say yes. Hi and thank you so much for the question. My name is Bonnie Paresi and I lead the product accessibility team and we love partnering with BIT. So, thank you so much. I can attest that we are deeply committed. This is actually the mission of my team to ensure that everybody can use and get value from our products as we ship them. And so I encourage you, we have a dedicated accessibility support team who would love to know about issues or regressions in the product as you're using them. Please, please file them. We will work closely with that team to understand them and get them unblocked. But this is our remit is to make sure that we don't have challenges with people who are using assistive technology or who have a diverse set of abilities. And so I am here offering time to discuss more but this is a top level commitment all the way to the time it takes us to remediate defects that goes all the way to the top. So I can assure you that that commitment is still there and would love to discuss further issues or just ongoing roadmap.
Andrew 37:38 ↗
Yeah. Would you mind connecting just after we're done here and just have a quick discussion on this get into more detail? That'd be great.
Yeah. Thank you. And I will say I've had great conversations with people. It's not that I don't think that the company is committed, but I think the work is fragmented and it felt like something that I wanted to bring to true to the core because yeah, I think accessibility has to be a core issue or it's just impossible.
Parker Harris 38:03 ↗
I mean, it sounds like we're dedicated to it. You agree, but we're regressing too much on the product where we're hitting issues that you're seeing. Is that right?
Andrew 38:12 ↗
Yes. And in many ways you go above and beyond like this isn't you know meeting some legal standard or whatever but just making this place like a first class platform where people like me can unleash their full potential and be competitive in a sighted world. It's really important.
Parker Harris 38:28 ↗
And again maybe we can figure out in our software development life cycle loop how AI might catch these before the regressions get out to you and cause you issues. So we'll do better.
Andrew 38:46 ↗
Thank you very much.
Siokumar 38:47 ↗
Yeah. I just want to add over here. So first thank you. We take this feedback very seriously. Bonnie and the platform team work very closely to each other. The tools that you articulated, we have efforts around them to improve the accessibility in terms of any new applications that are being generated whether or agents that are being generated whether that is pro code, whether that is from our no code set of tools, accessibility is number one and top of mind for us as well. It's built in from get-go. So again, we'd love to keep partnering with you and you have our commitment.
Andrew 39:19 ↗
Awesome. Awesome. Thank you.
Maham Hassan 39:26 ↗
So hello I'm Maham Hassan. I am a Salesforce solutions architect based in Dubai. So forward deployed engineering seems to be an important part of the future of the Salesforce career and Salesforce is doing an amazing job enabling the partners to build the skills and get certified FTE predictions. But the challenge is these programs are primarily for the partners and for the solo consultants the opportunities to participate in these workshops are quite limited. So my question is what roadmap or pathways are available for the solo consultants to participate in these certified FTE practitioners program and help themselves accelerate their careers.

53 more exchanges in this transcript

Sign in free to read the rest of this interview. No card required.

Sign in to read the full transcript

Cite this transcript

APA, MLA, BibTeX
APA

Harris, P. (2026, September 18). Live Q&A with Product Leaders | True to the Core, Dreamforce 2026 [Interview transcript]. Salesforce. CEOInterviews.AI. https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2916652/

MLA

Parker Harris. "Live Q&A with Product Leaders | True to the Core, Dreamforce 2026." Salesforce, 18 Sep. 2026. Transcript, CEOInterviews.AI, https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2916652/.

BibTeX
@misc{harris2026_2916652,
  author       = {Parker Harris},
  title        = {Live Q\&A with Product Leaders | True to the Core, Dreamforce 2026},
  howpublished = {Interview transcript, Salesforce. CEOInterviews.AI},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = {sep},
  url          = {https://ceointerviews.ai/interview/2916652/},
  note         = {Speaker-attributed transcript with timestamps}
}