A framework for frontier AI and the dawning of a new age. This is a pivotal moment in human history. Artificial general intelligence, AGI, a system that exhibits all the cognitive capabilities the brain has, is probably only a few short years away. When we look back on this time in the decades to come, I think we will realize we were standing in the foothills of the singularity. Nothing less than the dawning of a new age for humanity.
I've spent my whole life working on AGI because I've always had a deep conviction that if built and deployed responsibly, it would prove to be one of the most beneficial and transformative technologies ever invented. AGI cannot be compared to standard technological breakthroughs. Not even ones as consequential as the internet or mobile. It is much more akin to the discovery of electricity or fire. If you stop to think about it, we've essentially found a way to make sand think. It's miraculous. The magnitude of this technology's impact will be unprecedented. Perhaps 10x of the industrial revolution at 10x the speed. It will help us solve some of the biggest problems society faces, from accelerating drug discovery to developing new clean energy sources to creating novel advanced materials. We could even reach a point where resources are no longer the limiting factor for human progress, leading to an amazing new era of abundance.
The challenges of the frontier. AI is already starting to deliver real-world benefits, but to realize its immense promise, we have to navigate this critical period of development thoughtfully and carefully. Urgent action is needed to address risks that might arise as we get closer to AGI. We've already seen the challenges frontier models pose for cybersecurity, and other threats, including nuclear and bio risks, may soon emerge as capabilities continue to advance. On the horizon, we will need robust safeguards to maintain control of increasingly recursively self-improving systems and tackle unknown issues that will only become clearer over time.
I've always believed in the power of human ingenuity and creativity to solve any problem. I'm confident that mitigating the technical risks related to AI is a challenge we can collectively address, but only if we give ourselves the time and space to get this next crucial step right. Currently, as a field and a wider society, we aren't doing that. At the moment, we are locked in an extremely intense, multi-layered commercial and geopolitical race. While these competitive dynamics fuel rapid progress and accelerate the incredible upsides, advances on the frontier are outpacing our understanding of the technology. Nobody in the world knows for sure what is going to happen from here, and even the experts disagree. When there is a large degree of uncertainty and the stakes are this high, proceeding with cautious optimism is the sensible and correct strategy. That calls for public policy that promotes innovation while also incentivizing responsibility and security, fosters international collaboration on key safety issues, and encourages careful consideration of how AI is deployed for the benefit of society.
A framework for a frontier AI standards body. The rapid progress we are seeing in AI requires a new approach to testing frontier AI model capabilities that is dynamic, adaptable, and rigorous. The US is well positioned given its economic and technical standing to take the first step in developing such a framework. It could establish a new standards body modeled on a federally overseen public-private partnership or self-regulatory organization, much like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, FINRA. With a board that includes independent leading technical experts and open-source representatives. Funding would need to be substantial, mostly coming from industry, in order to attract world-class technical talent and provide the necessary computer resources for large-scale testing.
The standards body would be responsible for developing assessment protocols and working with appropriate federal agencies and the US national labs to conduct testing in areas relevant to national security. A model would qualify as frontier class if it meets certain thresholds on a set of benchmarks determined by the standards body and regularly updated to keep pace with evolving AI capabilities. Organizations with frontier models, as defined by those benchmarks, would be deemed frontier labs and be encouraged to adopt best practices such as publishing model cards with technical details, maintaining strong internal cybersecurity, vetting key personnel, and providing sufficient resourcing for safety and security research, and more.
Initially, frontier labs would voluntarily share models with the standards body for review up to 30 days before release. Once the assessment protocol is shown to be effective and robust, formalization could quickly follow, meaning the frontier models would be required to pass it to be deployed in the US markets. Labs would also work with the standards body to address any critical post-release vulnerabilities.
Model assessments should include rigorous scientific evaluations of capabilities in cybersecurity, biological threats, and other high-risk domains. Specific agentic AI tests could look for attempts to bypass safety guardrails or signs of deception and ensure best practices such as digitally watermarking AI-generated images and generating human-readable output tokens to understand model reasoning. These evaluations would be regularly updated, perhaps quarterly to start, with outdated or saturated benchmarks being deprecated and replaced. Initially, they would be developed in consultation with frontier labs, but eventually the standards body should build up the technical capacity to create its own held-out tests independent of the labs to prevent overfitting. Working with the US government, it could promote an ecosystem of third-party auditors to help with the assessments and development of new benchmarks and evaluations.
The strength of this approach is it would be technically focused while at the same time supporting innovation and incentivizing responsible behavior. It is designed to keep up with the field's acceleration and adapt to the biggest risks as they are identified, and could be ratcheted up if the seriousness of the situation demands it, including coordinating a slowdown in development among the frontier labs if deemed necessary. Being designated a frontier lab would carry significant prestige and be open to any organization by building models that meet the benchmark criteria. The framework could apply to frontier class models no matter their country of origin or whether they are open or closed, but any non-frontier models, say from a startup or academia, would be exempt from this process.
This US-initiated effort would provide a strong starting point for creating shared international standards on frontier AI. Since this technology is going to affect the entire planet, ideally this framework would inspire the international community to reach a consensus on how to manage the most serious risks while ensuring everyone has access and can benefit from the opportunities that AI brings.
The future is not yet written. AGI has the potential to be the ultimate tool for advancing science and medicine, and to drive enormous productivity gains and economic growth. But, in order to achieve this, we need to get the technical foundations right by coordinating around a shared global framework, using the most rigorous scientific methods, and bringing the best minds together to work on the challenges we face. Even if we solve these hard technical challenges, there will be further complex economic and philosophical questions to tackle. What sorts of new economic models will be needed to help everyone thrive in a post-scarcity world? What values do we want to live by? What will meaning and purpose be? And how might even the human condition itself change? Resolving these questions obviously cannot and should not be left to technologists alone. It requires every part of society to come together to help define this new chapter.
There is both huge excitement and uncertainty around AI, and both are warranted. But, the future is not yet written. We must use this precious window before AGI arrives to shape this technology for the benefit of all humanity. What we collectively do now will determine how the next phase of civilization unfolds. By safely steering AGI into the world, we can enter a new golden age of scientific discovery and progress, and usher in a bright future of incredible human flourishing.
